CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Axisymmetric pipe model confusion

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 3, 2006, 05:57
Default Axisymmetric pipe model confusion
  #1
Ahmed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Do we have to model the half pipe horizontally? Because if we make it vertical the symmetry axis boundary will be parallel to (or on) the y axis and the velocity inlet that we define becomes radial rather than axial.

Axial means parallel to the axis and we need it to be axial. It is easy when the half pipe is horizontal. But in my model, because I want to see the gravity effects when the pipe is vertical, does FLUENT make the correct calculations for the "axisymmetric flow 2d" while the radial velocity is the value I give for velocity inlet?
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 3, 2006, 07:45
Default Re: Axisymmetric pipe model confusion
  #2
kp
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
For velocity you need to divide your velocity with inlet dispersed phase volume fraction.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 3, 2006, 09:45
Default Re: Axisymmetric pipe model confusion
  #3
Ahmed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hi!

What do you mean by that?
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 3, 2006, 10:07
Default Re: Axisymmetric pipe model confusion
  #4
Aidan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
set the problem up as a horizontal pipe. The effects of gravity in the axial or radial direction are included by specifing the direction of gravity in the operating conidtions panel. For example, for a vertical pipe, gravity for the x-direction is set to -9.81 and 0.0 for y-direction.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 3, 2006, 16:30
Default Re: Axisymmetric pipe model confusion
  #5
Ahmed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi and thanks for your answer Aidan.

Very interesting thing happens when I do that. (gx=-9.81 and gy=0 in the operating conditions window)

The results do not change. All the same. Even the iteration number for convergence is same.

Am I missing something or do we change the gravity from another menu? I have checked what i do 2 times and it is still the same. Did you try that?

Thanks again... Anybody.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 26, 2014, 07:41
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Goutam Saha
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 131
Rep Power: 14
Goutam is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahmed
;127404
Hi and thanks for your answer Aidan.

Very interesting thing happens when I do that. (gx=-9.81 and gy=0 in the operating conditions window)

The results do not change. All the same. Even the iteration number for convergence is same.

Am I missing something or do we change the gravity from another menu? I have checked what i do 2 times and it is still the same. Did you try that?

Thanks again... Anybody.
Dear Ahmed, I did the same thing, but I found the results doesn't change. Did you able to solve this issue? Thanks for your time.
Goutam is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to use axisymmetric model? Jeffery FLUENT 22 July 11, 2019 07:20
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 05:36
about Subgrid-scale model impecca OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 December 20, 2013 10:36
model of pipes inside pipe carmen FLUENT 0 January 22, 2009 09:27
axisymmetric model issue prc Siemens 4 February 7, 2007 06:42


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:34.