# pressure difference - which surface integral?

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 January 4, 2006, 11:29 pressure difference - which surface integral? #1 Ralf Schmidt Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links Hi, I want to calculate the pressure drop of an apparatus. Now, how to calculate the pressure difference? I take ->report->surface integrals and select the inlet and the outlet of my apparatus. But what report type is the right one? "Integral" or "Area-weighted-Average" or any other?? There are different values resulting... Thanks Ralf

 January 4, 2006, 11:46 Re: pressure difference - which surface integral? #2 lcw Guest   Posts: n/a I think "Area-weighted-Average" is right. In addition, pay attention to the "static pressure difference" and "total pressure difference".

 January 5, 2006, 02:50 Re: pressure difference - which surface integral? #3 mAx Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, You have to work with Facet Average (choose total pressure). It will compute the average total pressure on the desired surface. If you take inlet and outlet at the same time, fluent will compute the average on surfaces inlet + outlet. So you have to compute the total pressure (Facet Average) on inlet, and then on the outlet. You get 2 values, one for inlet and one for outlet. dp= paverage inlet - paverage outlet mAx

 January 5, 2006, 04:15 Re: pressure difference - which surface integral? #4 Ralf Schmidt Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, I'm a little bit confused... When I take total pressure for pressure drop calculation, it is the static + the dynamic pressure... but the velocities in the inlet and in the outlet are different (different cross-sections)! So the dynamic pressure difference will NOT give me right results... isn't it? Second, when Fluent reports the pressures at different times, the values are the same than reporting at the same time. The only difference is that when reporting at the same time, a third value appears: "net". Does anybody know what kind of value that is? It is NOT the difference between inlet and outlet! It is about factor 1,626 smaller than the inlet pressure value (Area-Weighted Average Static Pressure) calculated for 9 different geometries… Any Help is appreciated!! Ralf

 January 5, 2006, 05:16 Re: pressure difference - which surface integral? #5 mAx Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, I suppose the "Net" value is the summ of both values. But as you computed your pressure with Area Weighted Average, the "Net" value you get should be like: paverage = (p1*A1 + p2*A2) /(A1 + A2) where p1,A1 is the pressure and Area on inlet and p2,A2 on outlet. Once again compute your pressure on inlet, and then re-compute the pressure on outlet. Then substract both values. This is my way for computing drop pressures in hydraulic valves.

 January 5, 2006, 06:05 Re: pressure difference - which surface integral? #6 Muhammad Shakaib Guest   Posts: n/a I have doubt about using facet averages for pressure on a surface. I think area weighted is more appropriate since it will work with non-uniform meshes.

 January 9, 2006, 13:18 Re: pressure difference - which surface integral? #7 mat w Guest   Posts: n/a I agree with Muhammad and lcw - area weighted average is the option to choose, facet average will give you results based on the size of the mesh facets. This was a mistake that I initially made when I started with Fluent.

 January 10, 2006, 01:27 Re: pressure difference - which surface integral? #8 mAx Guest   Posts: n/a ok, but in my cases, it doesn't change my results ( I checked and compared with facet average / area weighted average / Mass weigthed average) I get always the same results.

 January 17, 2006, 16:41 Re: pressure difference - which surface integral? #9 margaret mkhosi Guest   Posts: n/a Thank you a lot. It works!

 December 11, 2012, 14:25 Total or static #10 Member   Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: US Posts: 43 Rep Power: 8 The pressure you measured at the inlet is total pressure or static pressure? Can someone clarify this ? I'm guessing it's total pressure as the surface is perpendicular to the flow direction. But on the other hand, the surface is not like the Pitot tube but only doing the average. I got confused. Please advice.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post lanterbw Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 4 January 28, 2013 16:31 a.lynchy FLUENT 3 March 23, 2012 14:45 jbmackay OpenFOAM 0 September 22, 2010 15:51 ouafa Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 7 May 21, 2010 12:43 monica Siemens 1 April 19, 2007 11:26