|
[Sponsors] |
Problem with Dissipation rate storage in UDMI |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello, I will try to explain the problem that I have when I store the value of Turbulent Dissipation Rate (Epsilon) into an UDMI. I need to calculate a drag coefficient with epsilon but i wanted to check if the variable C_D(c,t) is well considered in my function. So Compiling is ok, but when I watch the contours of "Epsilon" and the "UDMI" corresponding to epsilon, the values are different if "node values" is checked, the non-"node values" are however the same (which is good).
But I want to know why in this case the "node values" are different. This only happens with "Epsilon". Storing "k", for instance, in an UDMI gives the same value as the "k" calculating from Fluent. Thanks Regards, Sam |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
question for specific dissipation rate | kippo | Main CFD Forum | 8 | April 2, 2021 15:42 |
Turbulence dissipation rate source | roman10 | STAR-CCM+ | 0 | May 9, 2011 12:29 |
Roughness length, interpolation, unphysical dissipation rate on the ground | apaleftos | STAR-CD | 0 | February 14, 2011 04:37 |
Dissipation rate access | K. Kevala | FLUENT | 0 | July 14, 2004 11:11 |
Turbulence dissipation Rate | Rahul | FLUENT | 0 | January 29, 2004 10:37 |