|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm simulating a flow around a bluff body with RSM model. The y plus decreases under 11 in the points in which the velocity is zero. The results show correlation with experimental data. Can this be considered acceptable? Thanks in advance! Anto
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It's perfectly fine to have such a small fraction of elements where y+ becomes too small.
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thanks you! So do you think RSM works fine with separation? Kind regards Anto
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bluff body used for diffuser testing | lemat1 | Siemens | 0 | December 5, 2009 10:11 |
| Bluff Body | krithiga | Siemens | 4 | November 7, 2006 16:45 |
| BLUFF BODY+ RSM | Anto | FLUENT | 2 | August 3, 2005 06:09 |
| UDF for lift force on a bluff body | sawa | FLUENT | 2 | April 11, 2005 04:06 |
| triangular bluff body | Pratap | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 5, 2004 03:23 |