# BC for a wind tunnel

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 March 8, 2006, 05:27 BC for a wind tunnel #1 spepsicho Guest   Posts: n/a hi all I'd like to simulate a typical problem: a car in a wind tunnel, to get correlation with real tests. I've read many articles that say the BC type to apply for the top and external side walls is the symmetry one. But why??? In a real wind tunnel, the top and side walls are not moving and they (unfortunately) interfere with the tested model: the properties of symmetry BC (all gradients = 0, I guess) are thus not always verified. Shouldn't be more appropriate to simply use stationnary walls? Please give me your ideas. regards

 March 8, 2006, 06:06 Re: BC for a wind tunnel #2 satish Guest   Posts: n/a the wind tunnels they may be very large such that the interaction of the flow is negligible and the gradients will be zero so i think symmetry conditions are perfect.

 March 8, 2006, 06:42 Re: BC for a wind tunnel #3 mateus Guest   Posts: n/a If you belive that the tunnel walls influence the flow arround the car you should definetelly use stationary wals with (for example) wall functions. But in most applications the walls are far enough from the model so that they don't influence is (at least it should be so). Then you can use symmetry which is in essence wall with free slip condition. This will symplify your simulation and decrease comp. time. by MATEUS

 March 8, 2006, 07:23 Re: BC for a wind tunnel #4 spepsicho Guest   Posts: n/a OK, this is the confirmation I neeeded ;o))) I thank you both

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post yogesh@cfd Main CFD Forum 0 November 8, 2010 05:28 pixie Main CFD Forum 1 August 20, 2009 08:02 littlelz CFX 4 June 11, 2009 05:51 ND FLUENT 0 April 7, 2006 07:43 Mike Worthey Main CFD Forum 0 June 6, 2000 02:27

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:39.