Explanation needed: buoyancy->coupled->implicit... -- CFD Online Discussion Forums

March 23, 2006, 13:03	Explanation needed: buoyancy->coupled->implicit...	#1
Sasha Guest Posts: n/a	Hi, I'd be greateful if somebody could explain me why using coupled solver with implicit formulation is the best choice for buoyancy driven flows? Why coupled and why implicit. BTW: segregated unsteady gave me as good results as coupled implicit steady solving Ra=10^9 square enclosure with temperature differential on the vertical walls. Does coupled solver use some pseudo time-steps? Marching or so? Cause there should be the reason for CFL number appearence in solution control. Thanks a lot. wc34071209 likes this.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
DPM Coupled Implicit	Aimara	FLUENT	0	April 25, 2007 16:23
Convergence with coupled implicit solver	Henrik Ström	FLUENT	1	October 29, 2005 03:57
QUESTIONS about Coupled Implicit	manish	FLUENT	0	March 6, 2005 21:05
Help! Coupled Vs Implicit - Total temperature	sile	FLUENT	3	March 10, 2003 15:58
Coupled 1D/3D STAR-CD Training	CD adapco Group Marketing	Siemens	1	November 13, 2002 15:48

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:45.