CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

y+ for k-omega = 30 ???

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 15, 2006, 05:59
Default y+ for k-omega = 30 ???
Ralf Schmidt
Posts: n/a

the Fluent Manual suggests to have the y+ for k-w within the log layer 30 < y+ < 300 - a value close to the lower bound is most desirable.

I do not know, if thats a good idea. I have bad results compared to the same msh with k-e and wall functions.

The other point is, that for y+ = 30, the first cell is ab. 10% of the charactersitic lenght (diamater of a cylinder in axial flow).

Any Ideas?

  Reply With Quote

Old   May 15, 2006, 11:03
Default Re: y+ for k-omega = 30 ???
fanzhong Meng
Posts: n/a
hi In Fluent user's manual,it is y* should be in the region between 30 to 300. not y+! If you want to use k-w model with enhanced wall treatment, you should alway keep your y+ close to 1. In this way, you can probably solve the boundary layer better!

fanzhong Meng
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 16, 2006, 02:05
Default Re: y+ for k-omega = 30 ???
Ralf Schmidt
Posts: n/a

Thanks for your reply. But: the Fluent Manual (FLUENT 6.2 Documentation) is very clear at this point:

node466, section 11.10.4

"Near-Wall Mesh Guidelines for the k- omega Models

...if [Transitional Flows] option is not active, then the mesh guidelines should be the same as for the wall functions"

and further on:

node463, section 11.10.1

"Near-Wall Mesh Guidelines for Wall Functions

For standard or non-equilibrium wall functions, each wall-adjacent cell's centroid should be located within the log-law layer, 30 < y+ < 300. A y+ value close to the lower bound y+ = 30 is most desirable."

Now, the question might be, if it is importand to have the "Transitional Flows option" not active for a cylinder in axial flow at Re = 20000 (based on cylinder Diameter)?

Any Idea???


  Reply With Quote

Old   May 20, 2006, 17:28
Default Re: y+ for k-omega = 30 ???
Posts: n/a
Fluent's k-omega model is not good, look at the formula from standford university. Use rsm instead.

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
overshooting of Omega in SST komega using simpleFoam cm_jubayer OpenFOAM 1 August 26, 2011 13:18
Boundary Conditions for k omega SST dancfd OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 0 June 9, 2011 23:25
Omega at the wall sla FLUENT 0 January 10, 2011 05:16
Use of k omega turbulence model john_w OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 September 22, 2009 05:15
Wall function implementation K Omega SSt cbarry OpenFOAM 3 August 18, 2009 10:09

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38.