UDF of interfacial thermal diffusivity
The following is my udf code of setting thermal diffusivity on coupling heat transfer interface. It can be worked but I think it does not affect the simulation results.Can somebody give some advice on it? Thanks! DEFINE_PROFILE(cwall_diff, tf, position) { face_t f;
real er0[ND_ND], er1[ND_ND], es[ND_ND], r0[ND_ND], r1[ND_ND], xf[ND_ND]; real ds, h0, h1, dr0,dr1; cell_t c0 = F_C0(f,tf); /* returns ID for c0*/ cell_t c1 = F_C1(f,tf); /*returns ID for c1 */ begin_f_loop(f, tf) { F_CENTROID(xf, f,tf); C_CENTROID(er0, c0,THREAD_T0(tf)); NV_VV(r0, =, xf,,er0); dr0 = NV_MAG(r0); h0 = dr0/C_K_L(c0,tf); C_CENTROID(er1, c0,THREAD_T1(tf)); NV_VV(r1, =, xf,,er1); dr1 = NV_MAG(r1); h1 = dr1/C_K_L(c1,tf); NV_VV(es, =, er1,,er0); ds = NV_MAG(es); F_PROFILE(f, tf, position) = ds/(h0 + h1); /* harmonic mean of adjacent grids in different zone*/ } end_f_loop (f,tf) } 
Re: UDF of interfacial thermal diffusivity
Does anybody has some opinion about it? When i solve conjugate heat transfer between fluid and solid, it will be imporatant in wholefield solution. And i find in Fluent, the coupling face interfacial thermal diffusivity is dealed with algorithmic mean, but not with harmonic mean? Is it right?

All times are GMT 4. The time now is 12:46. 