hanging nodes in fluent;

July 20, 2006, 07:20

When I try to import hanging nodes into fluent it gives the following error:

Reading Cell Tree: failed while reading section 58.

Clearing partially read grid.

Does anyone have an idea how to solve? I generate the mesh with ICEM CFD. First it was giving the error of "uncovered faces". I solved it with the grid check menu of ICEM. However, fluent didnt accept the grid.

thanks anyway Zafer

cscalo · April 9, 2013, 01:51

I have the same problem in a Fluent-like solver.. can somebody post the solution to this?

Far · April 9, 2013, 06:00

is it a 2d case ? What is your ICEM version?

asal · April 9, 2013, 07:59

Hi!

What is the ration of hanging node? Fluent ignore the 1=>2 ratio. but if the ratio is more than this, you have to merge them in ICEM, before you export to .msh

cscalo · April 9, 2013, 12:19

Thank you for your reply. In my case the refinement goes from 1 to 2. I think the problem is in my solver. However, in the case I use fluent, do I really just leave the uncovered faces unfixed (for example, without rebuilding the topology) and just export the .msh file?

I also read solutions that imply the doubling of faces and nodes at the interface, I was wondering if this is a solution that is usually used.

If these solutions don't work for me I will surrender with the polihedra interface (via "resolve refinement").

Thank you guys

Tarantino · April 9, 2013, 14:24

I have the same Problem!

asal · April 9, 2013, 14:25

Hi!

If your solver is fluent, just export the mesh and run if the ration is 1 to 2. Don't care about the uncovered faces!

July 20, 2006, 07:20	hanging nodes in fluent;	#1
Zafer Zeren Guest Posts: n/a	When I try to import hanging nodes into fluent it gives the following error: Reading Cell Tree: failed while reading section 58. Clearing partially read grid. Does anyone have an idea how to solve? I generate the mesh with ICEM CFD. First it was giving the error of "uncovered faces". I solved it with the grid check menu of ICEM. However, fluent didnt accept the grid. thanks anyway Zafer

April 9, 2013, 01:51	I have the same problem..	#2
cscalo New Member Carlo Join Date: Apr 2013 Posts: 10 Rep Power: 13	I have the same problem in a Fluent-like solver.. can somebody post the solution to this?

April 9, 2013, 12:19	hanging nodes	#5
cscalo New Member Carlo Join Date: Apr 2013 Posts: 10 Rep Power: 13	Thank you for your reply. In my case the refinement goes from 1 to 2. I think the problem is in my solver. However, in the case I use fluent, do I really just leave the uncovered faces unfixed (for example, without rebuilding the topology) and just export the .msh file? I also read solutions that imply the doubling of faces and nodes at the interface, I was wondering if this is a solution that is usually used. If these solutions don't work for me I will surrender with the polihedra interface (via "resolve refinement"). Thank you guys

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Two questions on Fluent UDF	Steven	Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming	7	March 23, 2018 03:22
problem of running parallel Fluent on linux cluster	ivanbuz	FLUENT	15	September 23, 2017 19:12
Abaqus - Fluent Coupling WITHOUT MPCCI	s.mishra	FLUENT	1	April 5, 2016 06:47
Rocks 5.4 Rsh Connection Refused for Fluent 6.3	bucnikf90	Hardware	2	March 29, 2012 16:24
displaying hanging nodes	Ralf Schmidt	FLUENT	1	July 20, 2006 07:22

April 9, 2013, 06:00		#3
Far Super Moderator Sijal Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Islamabad Posts: 4,553 Blog Entries: 6 Rep Power: 54	is it a 2d case ? What is your ICEM version?

April 9, 2013, 07:59		#4
asal Senior Member Astio Lamar Join Date: May 2012 Location: Pipe Posts: 186 Rep Power: 13	Hi! What is the ration of hanging node? Fluent ignore the 1=>2 ratio. but if the ratio is more than this, you have to merge them in ICEM, before you export to .msh

April 9, 2013, 14:24		#6
Tarantino Member Tarantino Join Date: Feb 2013 Posts: 46 Rep Power: 13	I have the same Problem!

April 9, 2013, 14:25		#7
asal Senior Member Astio Lamar Join Date: May 2012 Location: Pipe Posts: 186 Rep Power: 13	Hi! If your solver is fluent, just export the mesh and run if the ration is 1 to 2. Don't care about the uncovered faces!