# Average Facet, Surface Vertex or Area-Weighted

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 December 14, 2006, 00:01 Average Facet, Surface Vertex or Area-Weighted #1 Emmanuel Guest   Posts: n/a I want to obtain the value average velocity of the outlet of my model. I normally use REPORT=>SURFACE INTEGRAL then select AREA-WEIGHTED AVERAGE under REPORT TYPE and VELOCITY under FEILD VARIABLE. My problem is the the value I obtain is not close to the actual experimental values. It is substansially lower than the experimental values. But, if I use FACET AVERAGE of VERTEX AVERAGE instead of AREA-WEIGHTED AVERAGE, I better values, although higher than the experimental values. Example: In one case: Experimental value = 95.0 m/s Area-weighted = 64.5 m/s Facet average = 109.8 m/s Vertex average = 110.4 m/s Which should I use?

 December 14, 2006, 09:40 Re: Average Facet, Surface Vertex or Area-Weighted #2 hugo Guest   Posts: n/a OK If you want to report the average velocity of the oulet the correct way is use AREA-WEIGHTED AVERAGE because the velocity integral is with the Area-Weightes of each cell and the result is independent of the cell area distribution. In the other case the result depend on the mesh because the integral is without the Area-Weighted of each cell. For example the Vertex average is the sum of all vertex values on the oulet divided by the total number of vertex. Only in the case that you have a mesh perfectly uniform in area both case will be similar. good luck Adiaforos, Papes, hanheihei and 1 others like this.

 February 4, 2012, 22:04 #3 Member   Musango Lungu Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: China Posts: 73 Rep Power: 13 In my case I am simulating a gas-solid fluidized bed and i would like to obtain an axial profile of the solid volume fraction. which surface monitors are best suited, line/rake or points. Secondly which report type is most suitable, facet average ,area weighted average or vertex average

March 27, 2020, 10:55
I think maybe the area weighted average one
#4
Senior Member

Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 346
Rep Power: 8
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Musa In my case I am simulating a gas-solid fluidized bed and i would like to obtain an axial profile of the solid volume fraction. which surface monitors are best suited, line/rake or points. Secondly which report type is most suitable, facet average ,area weighted average or vertex average
I think maybe the area weighted average one

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post balkrishna OpenFOAM Post-Processing 12 October 11, 2021 22:37 SAM Main CFD Forum 31 April 30, 2018 04:12 ouafa OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 7 May 21, 2010 12:43 anif hidayatullah Main CFD Forum 2 April 7, 2010 13:47 zdz198728 Main CFD Forum 2 September 18, 2009 13:22

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top