 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
February 12, 2017, 07:54
|
radiation DTRM vs. S2S comparison
|
#1 |
|
New Member
saimen
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9  |
Dear CFD community,
I am simulating radiation heat transfer between two concentric cylinders filled with air and came up with the following problem: When I simulate heat transfer between the cylinders using S2S radiation I get different results as when I use DTRM with absorption coefficient 0. In my opinion these two models should deliver the same results... In my case we can assume an optical thin medium, therefore S2S radiation would fit well for the problem. I am a bit confused because DTRM more or less should do the same as S2S radiation for absorption coefficient 0. Does anyone have an explanation? Regards saimen |
|
|
|
|
|
February 14, 2017, 03:34
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member
saimen
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello all
I found the solution. Fluent does not like to have absorption coefficients that are 0. When i use e.g. 10e-5, then the DTRM shows similar behaviour as S2S. Regards saimen |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Tags |
| dtrm, fluent, heat transfer, radiation, s2s |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fluent Radiation/porous media | Schmitt pierre-Louis | FLUENT | 26 | September 1, 2016 10:29 |
| Monte Carlo Simulation: H-Energy is not convergating & high Incident Radiation | volleyHC | CFX | 5 | April 3, 2016 05:41 |
| Radiation Modeling | Chris89 | CFX | 20 | August 14, 2014 07:51 |
| GETVAR Error in Multiband Monte Carlo Radiation Simulation with Directional Source | silvan | CFX | 3 | June 16, 2014 09:49 |
| S2S radiation model | sagila | FLUENT | 3 | April 23, 2014 06:05 |
Linear Mode
