|March 12, 2007, 14:46||
validation of RAE2822
i have done a 2D SA turbulence case of the RAE2822 as per conditions of case study #4 on NPARC Alliance Validation website, M=0.729, alpha=2.31 etc. my model under predicted the position of the shock by about 5%. the mesh looks fine and gives a Y+<1. the residual converged at 1e-05.
so i really have two questions, 1) can this result be improved upon and how? 2) Are the free stream conditions given for case study #4 corrected values?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Validation test for 2d euler equations in subsonic regime with canonical squares||panou||Main CFD Forum||2||August 24, 2011 15:21|
|CFD validation case，Help！||adam_annie||Main CFD Forum||3||February 9, 2010 22:04|
|Grid validation||Dhania||Main CFD Forum||11||March 23, 2005 19:06|
|Urgent: RAE 2822 validation||NID||Main CFD Forum||0||September 3, 2004 10:34|
|Validation of shear mixing layer using kwsst||Samuell||FLUENT||0||September 9, 2003 22:46|