CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT


Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 19, 2007, 15:50
Default FVM vs FVM
Posts: n/a

generall opinion seems to be that:

FEM based solvers are less efficient (speed) and less accurate (balances of conservation quantities)

what do you seasoned guys say?

  Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2007, 18:44
Default Re: FVM vs FVM
Posts: n/a
FVM based solvers are more FUNNY, that's the difference.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2007, 10:33
Default Re: FVM vs FVM
Shaik Rizwan
Posts: n/a
FEM provides a continuous (up to a point) solution.

FVM is generally considered easier to program than FEM, but opinions vary on this point.

In FVM The resulting system of equations usually involves fluxes of the conserved variable, and thus the calculation of fluxes is very important in FVM.

FVM are generally expected to provide better conservation properties.

one particular method of CFD can not be applied to all the problems but the best way is not do generalization that one form is better than other but to do some riview of the previoius work for the specific problem u r dealing with.

hope this helps Regards

  Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2007, 06:01
Default Re: FVM vs FVM
Posts: n/a
happy to receive qualified opinions from seasoned guys. Generalizations aren't the target.

Scope of problems for which experience based opinions relating to the original question is seeked for (wrt which opinions are of primary interest):

sub to trans/supersonic, in/compressible, single phase w and w/o CHT under two-equation turbolence models.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 23, 2007, 08:47
Default Re: FVM vs FVM
Posts: n/a
Hi I think(my point of view): FVM is better than FEM in problems governed by diffusion as non premixed turbulent combustion flames (combustion reactions depends on micromixing of oxidant and fuel)...however I couldnīt generalize it because of depending on other reasons as interpolation schemes, kind of FVM, coordinates system, linear eq solver...etc.. It is only my opinion... very interesting topic... I hope opinions from CFD experts regards

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FVM in 1-D spherical coordinates lost.identity Main CFD Forum 0 January 17, 2011 10:06
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM kenn Main CFD Forum 2 July 18, 2004 18:28
References for FVM Anthony Wachs Main CFD Forum 8 February 20, 2002 20:23
FEM or FVM for CFD Astrid Main CFD Forum 18 December 15, 2000 01:02
Why FVM for high-Re flows? Zhong Lei Main CFD Forum 23 May 14, 1999 13:22

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:57.