|
[Sponsors] |
April 18, 2007, 03:55 |
upwind for micronozzle flow
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Good morning all, I'm running some simulations for micronozzle flow, and I can't understand which numerical method is best fitting: if I use a second order upwind scheme, I can see a weak shock in the divergent part of the nozzle, but if I use a first order upwind this shock becames weaker or disappear. Which solution should I consider correct? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2nd order upwind vs 2nd order upwind!!! | Far | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 14, 2013 12:29 |
benchmark: flow over a circular cylinder | goodegg | Main CFD Forum | 12 | January 22, 2013 11:47 |
Flow meter Design | CD adapco Group Marketing | Siemens | 3 | June 21, 2011 08:33 |
transform navier-stokes eq. to euler-eq. | pxyz | Main CFD Forum | 37 | July 7, 2006 08:42 |
Interpolation scheme for characteristic upwind for compressible flow | enok | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | May 8, 2006 14:37 |