CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

3D unconfined sphere

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 10, 2007, 04:46
Default 3D unconfined sphere
Posts: n/a
Dear I'm simulating the low Reynolds number flow past an unconfined sphere. The solution for Re = 25 was converged to the experimental results with only 2% error. This means that the mesh resolution and configuration are both correct. But when I run the simulation for Re = 0.5 using similar schemes that were used for the mentioned Reynolds number, the downward trend of continuity residuals go into a stall. The minimum drag coefficient, that is attainable after checking a large group of FLUENT's provided schemes, is equal to 98 while the right answer equals 48 (about 100% error). I don√’ know what is the problem? I shall be greatly indebted to you if you help me to override this.

Thanks Yours respectfully
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Meshing a sphere with snappyHexMesh Cyberholmes OpenFOAM 2 July 19, 2011 16:46
Coanda effect, condensation on sphere technophobe Main CFD Forum 4 February 17, 2010 11:04
3D unconfined sphere in stokes regime Kevin FLUENT 1 August 4, 2007 11:48
CFX analysis of a sphere - drag too low Rob Findlay CFX 6 March 26, 2007 10:11
meshing F1 front wing Steve FLUENT 0 April 17, 2003 12:37

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:48.