CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Porous_Natural_Convection; underestimating Nusselt

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 8, 2007, 00:47
Default Porous_Natural_Convection; underestimating Nusselt
  #1
Alex
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Users

Given: a 2D cavity filled with saturated porous medium.

BCs: Horizontal wall = Adiabatic; Vertical Wall = at constant tempereture (e.g., delta T=10°C)

Flow Regime: Laminar

When compared to available experimental and numerical data, Nusselt obtained from my work is underestimated and is lower in a wide range of Rayleigh numbers.

Nusselt is calculated from Nu=Q_Convection/Q_Conduction.

Is it right to get Q_Convection from: Report menu>Fluxes>Heat Transfer and reciprocate the permeability of porous media to obtain viscous resistance.

Please help me in solving this problem.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nusselt number? tash FLUENT 13 March 9, 2013 15:32
there is a problem with fully developed Nusselt number eeman Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 4 September 24, 2012 01:36
Nusselt Number jlx Main CFD Forum 2 January 14, 2011 13:30
Porous Natural Convection, underestimating Nusselt Alex FLUENT 2 August 9, 2007 00:26
Porous Natural Convection, underestimating Nusselt Alex FLUENT 0 August 8, 2007 00:41


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:04.