|
[Sponsors] |
Porous_Natural_Convection; underestimating Nusselt |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 8, 2007, 00:47 |
Porous_Natural_Convection; underestimating Nusselt
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Users
Given: a 2D cavity filled with saturated porous medium. BCs: Horizontal wall = Adiabatic; Vertical Wall = at constant tempereture (e.g., delta T=10°C) Flow Regime: Laminar When compared to available experimental and numerical data, Nusselt obtained from my work is underestimated and is lower in a wide range of Rayleigh numbers. Nusselt is calculated from Nu=Q_Convection/Q_Conduction. Is it right to get Q_Convection from: Report menu>Fluxes>Heat Transfer and reciprocate the permeability of porous media to obtain viscous resistance. Please help me in solving this problem. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nusselt number? | tash | FLUENT | 13 | March 9, 2013 15:32 |
there is a problem with fully developed Nusselt number | eeman | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 4 | September 24, 2012 01:36 |
Nusselt Number | jlx | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 14, 2011 13:30 |
Porous Natural Convection, underestimating Nusselt | Alex | FLUENT | 2 | August 9, 2007 00:26 |
Porous Natural Convection, underestimating Nusselt | Alex | FLUENT | 0 | August 8, 2007 00:41 |