CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

turbulent combustion

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 15, 2007, 14:26
Default turbulent combustion
palani kumar
Posts: n/a

i am trying to simulate the turbulent boundary layer combustion inside the combustion chamber of a hybrid rocket..its a diffusion flame happening at 5 bar chamber pressure..the fuel is 1,3-butadiene and the oxidiser is pure the first step i am having only gases enter the chamber..

for combustion i am using laminar finite rate model.. for turbulence, i had till date been using k-eps RNG model with the default parameters..i tried with laminar model also..

the reaction follows 2 step chemistry..CO forms in the first non-reversible reaction along with H2O and the second reversible reaction is the oxidation of CO..

the activation energy values and the pre-exponential factor values have been taken from a tech report by C L Merkle and S Venkateswaran, Pennsylvania state univ..

i have also been trying with single step model..

with both the models i have not yet been able to get a solution..

i first do the flow alone switching off the reaction..the moment i switch on the reaction the residuals start zooming up..the energy and continuity residuals go above 1E+2 and stays steady..

i am using coupled solver (density based)..with the seggregated solver (pressure based) the reactions get blown off..(that is the reaction rates gradually become low and there are no more reactions after sometime..even with patching the whole zone with a high high as 3000K..)

initially i worked with courant numbers of the order of 0.1 to 1..later i reduced them to 0.0001 and tried the whole thing..nothing much happened..

what could be the possible problems...???why is that the reactions get blown off in the pressure solver (with patching) where as they are not so with the density solver (even with out patching)..???which turbulence model is prefered for the boundary layer combustion..???pdf models are accurate, but this laminar finite rate model shud predict the flame, atleast at a wrong value, right..??

any suggestions..??or references..??

thanks a lot..

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
hel (turbulent viscosity ratio limited) for supersonic combustion problem omar.2002bh FLUENT 2 September 5, 2012 11:04
Turbulent Dispersion for Coal Combustion gravis CFX 2 March 24, 2010 00:56
combustion, chemical reaction or turbulent source? sogen Main CFD Forum 0 July 29, 2005 22:41
EDC, PDF transport and turbulent combustion HP FLUENT 6 March 30, 2005 03:00
NOx Formation in Turbulent hydrogen combustion Ali Yigit FLUENT 1 December 22, 2003 04:50

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10.