# opposed buoyancy__ required help

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 March 17, 2008, 09:31 opposed buoyancy__ required help #1 haris Guest   Posts: n/a i am working on opposed buoyancy effect on a heated cylinder at Re 100.i have done a steady state simulation at Richarson Number -1 (negative one). the residuals start increasing significantly after 1000 Iterations and becomes constant there after.the solution does not get converged .but lift coefficient varies sinusoidally with no. of iteration showing good vortex shedding .i want to know 1)will i get correct results even if the solution is not converged.2)if no then how to get the solution converged.

 March 19, 2008, 00:31 Re: opposed buoyancy__ required help #2 Hirdesh Guest   Posts: n/a As you are doing steady state study, solution should converged. If not, the residual should be well below than zero and do not change with time or periodically same. Try with reducing under relaxation factor of Momentum, Pressure, energy.

 March 20, 2008, 08:10 Re: opposed buoyancy__ required help #3 jamal Guest   Posts: n/a hi! Hirdesh, i tried that ....it did converged for very low value of residuals( 0.01). will that not effect the accuracy of results...... thanks

 March 20, 2008, 10:22 Re: opposed buoyancy__ required help #4 Isaac Guest   Posts: n/a I think that just because the residual values for say continuity goes below 1E-04 does not mean the solution is converged. In most cases when this happens, you have to monitor the difference in flow rates between inlet and outlet. If this is not steadily decreasing, and you see an oscillating trend (which you are in your lift), I think the problem may be inherently time dependent. It would be incorrect to model this as a steady state problem. Ofcourse the issue may just be that you do not have a good enough grid and the solution is steady state. You will have to do some checks to confirm. Hope this helps.

 March 23, 2008, 22:02 Re: opposed buoyancy__ required help #5 Hirdesh Guest   Posts: n/a Low value of under ralaxation method means you are reducing the increment of values par time step. It will not effect solution. Only thing is that solution will take more time to converge. but you should check grid independence.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Dinesh FLUENT 0 April 13, 2008 08:54 vijayaragavan FLUENT 5 February 14, 2008 03:01 gfcoppola OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 March 22, 2007 18:57 derick FLUENT 0 September 15, 2005 15:46 Julie Siemens 0 December 9, 2001 10:16

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54.