CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Aircraft Sim - TGrid and Gambit Meshes differences

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 23, 2008, 15:46
Default Aircraft Sim - TGrid and Gambit Meshes differences
  #1
Dave S
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have been comparing the results obtained with a mesh generated in TGrid and one in Gambit for an aircraft fuselage and for some reason there are large differences in the predicted drag co-efficient, as well as the number of cells needed in the domain. For both volume meshes an identical surface mesh (formed in Gambit) was used. Around the fuselage a 5 cell boundary layer was generated with a growth rate of 1.2 and an aspect ratio of 5. The initial cell size is such that the y+ value ranges between 15 and 250 so this is in the range of the standard wall functions. For the Gambit mesh the max skewness was 0.785 and for the TGrid one 0.75. The first point to note was that the volume mesh from Gambit comprised 2.9MM cells whilst that from TGrid was 1.89 MM. For this comparison use was made of tet cells. The prediction of the viscous drag from both meshes is the same whereas the pressure force (Z direction) differs markedly. For both simulations the reference values were identical and also in the X and Y directions the pressure force was the same, the only difference was in the Z direction. Has anyone seen something similar?
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2008, 03:03
Default Re: Aircraft Sim - TGrid and Gambit Meshes differe
  #2
DenizeN
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You have used the size function in gambith? Size functions may change number of cells.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2008, 04:36
Default Re: Aircraft Sim - TGrid and Gambit Meshes differe
  #3
Dave S
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I did but then again I used a refinement level of 9 in TGrid that according to the Fluent best practive for external aerodynamics should also give a growth rate through the domain of 1.2, which is the same as the sizing fuction in Gambit.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2008, 04:42
Default Re: Aircraft Sim - TGrid and Gambit Meshes differe
  #4
DenizeN
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think this is not same but near same. You problem lie in mesh dependensy. You must refine mesh.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2008, 05:10
Default Re: Aircraft Sim - TGrid and Gambit Meshes differe
  #5
Dave S
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you for that. I am trying local refinement in TGrid around the fuselage body. Fingers crossed.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2008, 05:49
Default Re: Aircraft Sim - TGrid and Gambit Meshes differe
  #6
DenizeN
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You are fuzelage with wings or mithout? If yes then mesh must be 10 or even more millions.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2008, 08:10
Default Re: Aircraft Sim - TGrid and Gambit Meshes differe
  #7
Dave S
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Currently without wings and tail area. They will be added shortly. Wanted to define a reliable meshing strategy before adding these items.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gambit Mesh for Nsoe Cone, Fuselage and Aircraft Vincent Ryan FLUENT 1 March 17, 2011 09:38
Meshing Aircraft with Gambit Ed FLUENT 5 November 9, 2004 06:04
Gambit :The differences between merge & unite ? bambang FLUENT 1 August 5, 2001 10:22
The differences between Merge & Unite in Gambit? bambang FLUENT 0 July 29, 2001 12:41
using Tgrid to join meshes carlos FLUENT 2 January 24, 2001 11:44


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:31.