 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
October 30, 2008, 01:46
|
Combustion Model
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am running a case in which the methane and air are introduced into a burner seperately. The result using eddy dissipation model looks good, however, the results using either finite rate/eddy dissipation or EDC are totally wrong. What's the matter with it?
Thanks a lot. |
|
|
||
|
November 1, 2008, 12:43
|
Re: Combustion Model
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
difference between pre-mixed and non-premixed flame model?
|
|
|
|
||
|
November 2, 2008, 12:14
|
Re: Combustion Model
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, Jesse Actually, the Non-premixed model available in FLUENT could give a sound results. I just wander why the finite-rate/eddy dissipation and EDC do not work?
|
|
|
|
||
|
November 11, 2008, 20:29
|
Re: Combustion Model
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
May I know more detailed about the case that you are simulating? I'm currently looking at EDC model as well. Maybe we can discuss about it.
|
|
|
|
||
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| combustion model in premixed combustion chamber | wuyu | FLUENT | 9 | February 16, 2018 10:40 |
| Sawdust Combustion-Non-premixed Combustion Model | Jessy | FLUENT | 1 | June 19, 2007 10:59 |
| Combustion model | MANOJ KUMAR | FLUENT | 2 | September 24, 2005 02:27 |
| Model combustion | KOchzg | FLUENT | 0 | April 4, 2005 10:46 |
| Combustion-which one is an appropriate model? | Shankar | FLUENT | 3 | February 16, 2004 15:57 |
Linear Mode
