|
[Sponsors] |
December 11, 2008, 14:09 |
When to use double precision?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
When is it beneficial to use the double precision solver for fluent? I can't seem to find a real answer to this anywhere.
Thanks. |
|
December 11, 2008, 14:25 |
Re: When to use double precision?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The use of double precision in Fluent is basically the same than for any other numerical code. It is needed everytime you need to capture a small variation of a quantity that can vary by large amounts. For instance if you have a very stretched mesh, with some cells dimensions beeing way higher than others, double precision will be helpful.
|
|
December 11, 2008, 15:15 |
Re: When to use double precision?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If I have models which are giving me many incompletes on the DPM, would double precision help eliminate them?
|
|
December 11, 2008, 16:57 |
Re: When to use double precision?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Most likely not, incomplete in DPM means that you are not having enough integration steps on your particles, or that the step are too small.
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
double precision cfx | pat | CFX | 5 | November 11, 2008 06:45 |
OpenFOAM Double precision vs Single Precision | alexandrepereira | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | June 11, 2008 14:30 |
When to use double precision | Mark Render | Main CFD Forum | 10 | January 21, 2008 12:16 |
UDF & Double precision; Please help?? | Asghari | FLUENT | 0 | January 31, 2007 13:14 |
Double Precision? | Novak Elliott | CFX | 1 | June 6, 2003 01:45 |