CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Integral of mass Imbalance drops with time

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 3, 2009, 11:38
Default Integral of mass Imbalance drops with time
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 10
TfG is on a distinguished road

I am simulating the cooling process of an oil tank submited to ambient air and I am having some troubles. First of all, i have increased the number of iterations per time step to 170, and each time step is 2s. With a mesh of 113000 elements (tank is 18m high and 23 diamater, too many elements?), having the first node 0.5 mm from the wall, I am not sure with criteria should I set for convergence in each step. The continiuty scaled residuals are constant slightly above 1e-3. For x and y scaled residuals I set 1e-3 for convergence criteria.

I have been simulating 200s and if I force to perform 170 iterations in each time step I get similar result with 3 meshes (17000, 41000 and 113000 elements). But if I set the convergence criteria of above (I dont check for continiuty because is always constant...?) I get different results: max velocity is half (order is around 1e-5) compared with no convergence checking simulations.

I have simulated checking convergence (otherwise it takes a hell of time) for the mesh of 113000 around 8000s and I have realized that the integral of mass imbalance starts to drop around 3300s. What could be the reason dor this? the residuals of continiuty rise slightly in that instant.

I would like to know the meaning of mass flow rate for "default-interior" too if anyone knows.

I post some pictures of scaled residuals, integral of mass imbalance, max velocity and heat loss (look that also for 3300s the behaviour changes dramatically for velocity and slightly for heat loss: so I guess something goes wrong there).

Other data: model:laminar, boussinesq approx, power law for momentum and energy, body force wighted for pressure, PISO for coupling, URF 0.3 pressure and 0.7 momentum.

I would appreciate your comments and suggestions because I don't know how to progress with this.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg MassImbalance.jpg (92.5 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg HeatLoss.jpg (28.0 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg maxv.jpg (70.7 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg residuals.jpg (26.6 KB, 7 views)

Last edited by TfG; April 3, 2009 at 11:56.
TfG is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mass imbalance reactions ?? Abel FLUENT 0 December 21, 2008 10:32
IcoFoam parallel woes msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 July 22, 2007 02:58
AMG versus ICCG msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 November 7, 2006 16:15
Why always imbalance over 134% for P & Solid Mass? Liwau CFX 0 March 11, 2004 23:52
unsteady calcs in FLUENT Sanjay Padhiar Main CFD Forum 1 March 31, 1999 12:32

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:50.