|
[Sponsors] |
July 31, 2009, 21:12 |
2D Axisymmetric vs. 3D
|
#1 |
New Member
Adam Loesch
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 16 |
I am running a drag study on a shape that is essentially a revolved airfoil. As a test, I ran this shape in a 3D case then to cut down on computational time, I ran it in an antisymmetric 2D case. Problem is that the antisymmetric 2D case yields a drag which is nearly three times that of the 3D case (0.06lbf as compared to 0.18lbf). My tests are being performed at low velocities (30fps). I realize that with this little amount of information it is impossible for anyone to give me a definitive cause, but I was curious if this much variation is to be expected with such a low velocity, Reynolds Number, and drag, and if so, which calculation is more likely to be closer to the actual physical case. Thank you for any insight you can provide.
|
|
August 3, 2009, 00:51 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
axisymmetric gives you results as it should be in 3d.
* Is your 3d-model a full one, or did you use symmetric planes? * Did you give same BC in 2d as in 3d? compare the massflow-rates between 3d and 2d-axi
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Axisymmetric Swirl | Arpit Tiwari | Main CFD Forum | 1 | September 15, 2010 05:45 |
Level set equation in axisymmetric 2-D flow | jinwon park | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 26, 2008 16:26 |
axisymmetric model issue | prc | Siemens | 4 | February 7, 2007 06:42 |
URGENT ! Need help on Axisymmetric Flow ! | Suman Kumar | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 20, 2001 14:51 |
Axisymmetric Flow | S. Kumar | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 10, 2001 10:15 |