|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
hi ,everybody.
I meet some troubles about raindrops simulation by DPM. I want to simulate full-scale raindrops by DPM.I use the surface injection. the computional domain is 3D and is very large,900*900*3000(height). So, the number of raidrops in domain is very very large with exceeding 1E+12. The bounded face was adopted as surface injection. Now, if I want to simulate this project, the grid faces in bounded face (surface injection) were very very large numbers .And , it must exceeds the capitcy of the Computer . Is any other way which I can choose to avaoid this problem? please. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
New Member
Luk
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
As I suppose, you want to decrease the number of raindrops tracked by DPM analyse.
The number of tracked particles in surface injections depend of the number of cells used to create this surface... something like that ![]() And there is no option to change the numbers. There are two options... You can use UDF (I have readen somewhere here about it, but never used it) or you can use injections from file... just create a file in notepad. Rename it to blabla.inj And inside write some lines (you can use Excell to compute this) like: Code:
(( x y z u v w diameter temperature mass-flow) name ) x,y,z - location u,v,w - velocities each in SI units eg: ((0.01 0.03 -2.1 0 0 -4.5 0.00004 123 0.001) 1) ((0.02 0.05 -1.9 0 0 -4.5 0.00004 123 0.001) 2) ... ... ((0.121 0.123 -67.1 0 0 -4.5 0.00004 123 0.001) 1131) Hope it will be works. Regards
__________________
******************************* |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
Thanks for Geisel
your reply give me a lightpoint,especially the second option would fit my problem well.I will try it immediately. Lastnight,I also thought another way that I will divide the full-scale computational domain into 12 parts by 30 degrees each part ,because the domain is axial symmetrical. I will carry out calculation only on one part. Then ,the domain is redued and the total drops is also reduced spontaneously. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Diesel Combustion with DPM simulation | Kamil Sobczak | FLUENT | 2 | March 29, 2016 04:58 |
Uregent: Fluent Error: DPM simulation, Segementation Error | ahad_5 | FLUENT | 0 | June 24, 2009 11:49 |
Solid Particle Simulation without DPM | Nikhil Dani | FLUENT | 0 | November 22, 2008 12:26 |
A parallel simulation problem in DPM | satum | FLUENT | 0 | October 21, 2008 05:38 |
problem about DPM of cyclone separator simulation | jason | FLUENT | 4 | November 12, 2007 03:15 |