|July 31, 2009, 21:12||
2D Axisymmetric vs. 3D
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8Rep Power: 9
I am running a drag study on a shape that is essentially a revolved airfoil. As a test, I ran this shape in a 3D case then to cut down on computational time, I ran it in an antisymmetric 2D case. Problem is that the antisymmetric 2D case yields a drag which is nearly three times that of the 3D case (0.06lbf as compared to 0.18lbf). My tests are being performed at low velocities (30fps). I realize that with this little amount of information it is impossible for anyone to give me a definitive cause, but I was curious if this much variation is to be expected with such a low velocity, Reynolds Number, and drag, and if so, which calculation is more likely to be closer to the actual physical case. Thank you for any insight you can provide.
|August 3, 2009, 00:51||
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,193Rep Power: 33
axisymmetric gives you results as it should be in 3d.
* Is your 3d-model a full one, or did you use symmetric planes?
* Did you give same BC in 2d as in 3d?
compare the massflow-rates between 3d and 2d-axi
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Axisymmetric Swirl||Arpit Tiwari||Main CFD Forum||1||September 15, 2010 05:45|
|Level set equation in axisymmetric 2-D flow||jinwon park||Main CFD Forum||0||February 26, 2008 17:26|
|axisymmetric model issue||prc||CD-adapco||4||February 7, 2007 07:42|
|URGENT ! Need help on Axisymmetric Flow !||Suman Kumar||Main CFD Forum||1||November 20, 2001 15:51|
|Axisymmetric Flow||S. Kumar||Main CFD Forum||0||November 10, 2001 11:15|