|
[Sponsors] | |||||
Re: Normalize the residuals to the order of three |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
balu
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Hello,
Can anyone help me understand the statement: "Normalize the errors/residuals to the order of three". What should be the input in FLUENT for the above mentioned statement? I tried giving 0.001 (1e-3) as the input for NORMALIZATION FACTOR after checking the NORMALIZE option from Solve --> Monitors --> Residuals WINDOW in FLUENT. Am I right? Do you think 1e-3 is the correct input for the statement, "NORMALIZE THE ERRORS/RESIDUALS TO THE ORDER OF THREE". If what I think is wrong, Can anyone help me out with the correct inputs to be given for NORMALIZATION FACTOR? Even if I am right, can you support my assumption with an explanation? Please help me!! Thank you in advance!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Second Order Upwind: Residuals | enricokr | FLUENT | 28 | January 2, 2018 18:41 |
| IS calc. with 2nd order discret. always necessary? | Azman | FLUENT | 2 | March 14, 2013 05:28 |
| 1st order vs 2nd order | ken | FLUENT | 8 | March 14, 2013 04:43 |
| Second order convergance. | Rob | FLUENT | 2 | July 20, 2004 11:49 |