CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

the differences between turbulence models

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree4Likes
  • 4 Post By Jade M

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 16, 2009, 04:44
Default the differences between turbulence models
New Member
agung wulan piniji
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 10
agungwp is on a distinguished road
hi guys,
as we know that there are any several turbulence models to simulate physical problems. it couldn't use one turbulence model to simulate all of the problems. i hope you are could explain to me the differences between the turbulence models. such as k-epsilon standard and rng, k-omega standard and sst, spallart-allmaras.
thank you very much
agungwp is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 16, 2009, 06:18
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 10
bramv101 is on a distinguished road
Uhm. This is basic CFD. get yourself a good handbook or usermanual for these type of things... Such questions are not likely to get answered on a forum
bramv101 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 16, 2009, 06:37
Senior Member
teguhtf's Avatar
teguh hady
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Saga, Japan
Posts: 161
Rep Power: 10
teguhtf is on a distinguished road
you can find it in CFD book!!!
it can be downloaded free CFD book on this site
teguhtf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 19, 2010, 17:04
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 145
Rep Power: 10
Jade M is on a distinguished road
Good question. I have been wondering this myself.

SST is a good default choice

Sparlart-Allmaras: Eeconomical for large meshes. Performs poorly for 3D flows, free shear flows, flows with strong separation. Suitable for mildly complex (quasi-2D) external/internal flows and boundary layer flows under pressure gradient (e.g. airfoils, wings, airplane fuselages, missiles, ship hulls).

Standard k-epsilon : Robust. Widely used despite the known limitations of the model. Performs poorly for complex flows involving severe pressure gradient, separation, strong streamline curvature. Suitable for initial iterations, initial screening of alternative designs, and parametric studies.

RNG k-epsilon :
Suitable for complex shear flows involving rapid strain, moderate swirl, vortices, and locally transitional flows (e.g. boundary layer separation, massive separation, and vortex shedding behind bluff bodies, stall in wide-angle diffusers, room ventilation).

Realizable k-epsilon : Offers largely the same benefits and has similar applications as RNG. Possibly more accurate and easier to converge than RNG.

Standard k-omega : Superior performance for wall-bounded boundary layer, free shear, and low Reynolds number flows. Suitable for complex boundary layer flows under adverse pressure gradient and separation (external aerodynamics and turbomachinery). Can be used for transitional flows (though tends to predict early transition). Separation is typically predicted to be excessive and early.

SST k-omega : Offers similar benefits as standard k–ω. Dependency on wall distance makes this less suitable for free shear flows.

Reynolds Stress : Physically the most sound RANS model. Avoids isotropic eddy viscosity assumption. More CPU time and memory required. Tougher to converge due to close coupling of equations. Suitable for complex 3D flows with strong streamline curvature, strong swirl/rotation (e.g. curved duct, rotating flow passages, swirl combustors with very large inlet swirl, cyclones).

Jade M is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! Wen Long Main CFD Forum 3 May 15, 2009 09:52
Turbulence Models and external flow. Alan FLUENT 3 November 22, 2005 05:46
How to set phase dependent turbulence models? J.Yang CFX 2 August 29, 2002 15:39
Why Turbulence models are not universal. Senthil Main CFD Forum 4 July 5, 2000 04:34

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56.