please contribute with ideas: fluent and false/numerical diffusion
false/numerical diffusion is a quite classical problem in CFD.
However I think that each simulation case should have more important corrections to handle that.I am having extreme numerical diffusion! Briefly my case is this: Fully developed flow along x direction. Free Atmospheric flow between ground and 150m high plane. Ground is flat so vy and vz are zero. I use orthogonal hexaedronds with r=1.07. I am doing dispersion with species and varying schmidt number. Sct=0.7 gives high numerical diffusion, which increases even more with lower schmidt numbers (e.g. 0.4). vx velocity=(0,43m.s-1/0.4)*ln[(z+z0)/z0]. Z0=0.1m. I am doing a point source emission and there is concentration of the emitted species even at upwind of its release! Thanks for your ideas on this. |
Where (which height) is your point source located?
|
i am doing different scenarios
point source (~1m3) at 10 m high or 30 m high. Is that relevant for Numerical diffusion? Numerical diffusion is higher near ground (e.g 1 meter high) because wind speed is slower?! Thanks |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:39. |