# AOA adjustment in CFD compuation.

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 May 25, 2010, 04:53 AOA adjustment in CFD compuation. #1 New Member   Luolin Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 1 Rep Power: 0 I had a look at the fluent tutorials at http://courses.cit.cornell.edu/fluent/airfoil/index.htm. I noticed that AOA 1.2° instead of 2° were used to calculate the actual AOA 2°. It was explained as a 2d adjustment. ("Note that 1.2° is used as our angle of attack instead of 2° to adjust for the error caused by assuming the airfoil to be 2D instead of 3D."). Could someone tell me how the 0.8° offset is decided? Is there any theory to support this? Thanks in advance. Your reply is really appreciated.

May 13, 2013, 06:53
#2
New Member

Ali
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Turkey
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6
Quote:
 Originally Posted by llbai@hotmail.com I had a look at the fluent tutorials at http://courses.cit.cornell.edu/fluent/airfoil/index.htm. I noticed that AOA 1.2° instead of 2° were used to calculate the actual AOA 2°. It was explained as a 2d adjustment. ("Note that 1.2° is used as our angle of attack instead of 2° to adjust for the error caused by assuming the airfoil to be 2D instead of 3D."). Could someone tell me how the 0.8° offset is decided? Is there any theory to support this? Thanks in advance. Your reply is really appreciated.
I want to ask the same question. I am searching but i couldn't find yet. For example ,If angle of attack is 4°, which degree must be use?

 May 13, 2013, 08:46 #3 Senior Member   OJ Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: United Kindom Posts: 475 Rep Power: 13 The 2D simulation of airfoil assumes that the width of airfoil wing in thierd direction is infinite, and the flow in the third direction is zero. While, in 3D (and reality) the width is finite and there is a finite flow in 3rd direction. Hence, for same inlet velocities, the lift for 2D will be always higher than ones from 3D and hence to realize the same effect of 2deg on 3D wing, the 2D wing uses smaller angle. There is some explanation provided here to estimate how these different values of angle of attack are related. http://www.mh-aerotools.de/airfoils/hdi_aoawing.htm OJ

May 13, 2013, 15:50
#4
New Member

Ali
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Turkey
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 6
Quote:
 Originally Posted by oj.bulmer The 2D simulation of airfoil assumes that the width of airfoil wing in thierd direction is infinite, and the flow in the third direction is zero. While, in 3D (and reality) the width is finite and there is a finite flow in 3rd direction. Hence, for same inlet velocities, the lift for 2D will be always higher than ones from 3D and hence to realize the same effect of 2deg on 3D wing, the 2D wing uses smaller angle. There is some explanation provided here to estimate how these different values of angle of attack are related. http://www.mh-aerotools.de/airfoils/hdi_aoawing.htm OJ
Thank you for the response. It was very helpful.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post CD adapco Group Marketing Siemens 0 February 13, 2002 13:23 John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 36 January 24, 2001 22:10 Chris R. Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 21, 2000 04:49 Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 12, 1999 23:27 Heinz Wilkening Main CFD Forum 38 March 5, 1999 12:44

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:27.