[Mohsin]

I have 2 cylinders. 1 cylinder is small and is at some distance inside of the bigger cylinder. The flow comes from the smaller cylnder and goes thorugh the bigger cylinder. But When I export the mesh a Default face wall boundary is created at the end face of the small cylinder. GAMBIT is not taking it as a continuum by default.

Can anybody please tell me how i can force continuum between them so that the face is not considered as wall by default. Thanks

Mohsin

[-mAx-]

post a picture and explain how you build your geometry.
Did you split /substract volumes?

[Mohsin]

Max Thank you for ur reply.

Attached is the geometry. I was talking about the upper 2 cylinders. The middle (smaller cylinder) is through in the bigger cylinder. when i export it to fluent it takes the lower end face of the middle cylinder as wall (Air is flowing through the lower end so I need Gambit to consider it as a continuum not a wall). How should i specify that

[-mAx-]

try to move the small cylinder.
If you can move it, then your geometry isn't ok.
In this cas you will need to split the biggest cylinder with the smallest. (but the question is what are you supposed to modelise)

[Mohsin]

Max thanks for ur reply. The middle cylinder is moving.

Actually I m simulating cyclone. The same cyclone which in the following tutorial he is making us learn to simulate.

http://www.itc.polsl.pl/gwecel/Mns/Fluent_tutorial.pdf

on page 14, he says about connect disconnet faces in order to make the middle cylinder as a continuum.

"After operation two volumes are linked by one face forcing later the same mesh to be generated for both volumes at that face. Not connected faces will be by default treated as wall"


could u please explain that.

[-mAx-]

If the faces aren't connected, then you have 2 superposed meshes, treated as wall by Fluent.
In your case I would split the small cylinder with the big one (enable Retain option).
And in the BC you need to enforce gambit setting the cover surface as wall. With split, gambit set automatically all internal surfaces (as Internal)

[Mohsin]

Max I m sorry I didnt get your point.

I dont want the cover face as wall. If I split the middle cylinder wityh the bigger cylinder then 2 cylinder volumes are created but still Gambit treats the cover face as wall. Could you please elaborate

[-mAx-]

Faces resulting from Split are treated as Internal (not wall)
If you get walls, then splits aren't correct.
But if you don't want the cover as wall, and the top as wall, then go and unite the 2 cylinders

[Mohsin]

Thank you for your time

Max yes faces resulting from split operation are treated as internal.But the face (which i have marked in picture) cannot to be splitted. I united the 2 cylinders but the lower face (as shown in picture) is always treated as wall.

Could you tell me how can i split it (the lower face shown in figure) so that it is not treated as wall.

I have tried number of ways to split it but in vain.

[-mAx-]

check if don't have superposed surface at this place.
If yes than connect them (surface/connect)

[Mohsin]

There is only 1 face at that place and no other face is superimposed.

[-mAx-]

Ok if you split volume 1 (biggest cylinder) with volume 4, you don't have problem.
I exported the mesh and I don't have any unwanted wall.
But if you need the cover surface (surface 11 ) inside the biggest volume, then you need to define it as wall in the BC
You will also have a problem with skewness because of small angle between edges 18 and 24.
You can sweep face 15 in x-direction with amplitude 0.01. And aplly a size function for refining the mesh along the suface 0.01x0.89

[Mohsin]

Thank you so much Max. I am really grateful.

Originally Posted by -mAx-

But if you need the cover surface (surface 11 ) inside the biggest volume, then you need to define it as wall in the BC

When i define wall inside and export in fluent. Fluent gives me an extra boundary condition "wall-shadow". What influence it may have on the result? and how to remove it?

[-mAx-]

Then something isn't correct.
But the issue with the top of small cylinder is ok, now?

I saw you set the BC before split operations.
I would alway set the BC once your mesh is ready. In your case, in the BC Panel select delete All, and redefine the BC.
If you still have the problem, send me the journal file describing all the steps till mesh export.

[Mohsin]

The upper cylinder problem is solved. Thankyou. as now its just a fluid zone not occupied with wall faces.

For Fluent problem which gives additional shadow wall term I got the following from CFD online discussions:

you will only get a shadow wall if the mesh on a common wall is the same. That is to say if their are two volume zones that are connected and separated by one wall then FLuent will split the wall into two, i.e wall and then its shadow. So the two volume zones each have their own identical wall.

Reference: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/flu...adow-wall.html

It just seperates the 2 fluid zones. So i may not be worried about it?

I tried what you asked me to do. i-e first I created gerometry and did all split operations, then mesh (checked with just very coarse mesh with less interval count) and then applied boundary conditions. But stuill fluent creates a shadow wall.

[-mAx-]

Ok, then you can try to iterate.
Else you can try spliting the volume at the same z-level than your top surface. (copy and move outer edges from big cylinder, create surface from them and split big volume with this surface).
Then the fluid volume will be completly splitted, and you shouldn't get the wall shadows.

[Mohsin]

Great Max.

I created a circular face and moved it until the lower face of cover and split it with the bigger cylinder. After that i splitted the middle cylinder with the bigger one and got the desired result. I have attached the picture.

Max you told me that

"You will also have a problem with skewness because of small angle between edges 18 and 24. You can sweep face 15 in x-direction with amplitude 0.01. And aplly a size function for refining the mesh along the suface 0.01x0.89 "

I splitted the face in x direction but it will create 2 faces and the problem with the original face (having sharp angles ) will remain there.
Also which size function is preferable in this case "Mesh, curvature or fixed"

Thank you for ur assistance.

P.S. I am unable to increase your reputation more now

[-mAx-]

Originally Posted by Mohsin

I splitted the face in x direction but it will create 2 faces and the problem with the original face (having sharp angles ) will remain there.
Also which size function is preferable in this case "Mesh, curvature or fixed"

Merge the 2 surfaces on both sides from the edge giving you trouble --> the edge will disappear
Regarding size funtion you can use fixed with start size 0.01 for instance

[Mohsin]

Error:
tried to merge faces that are not connected.
Tried to merge faces with diferent upper topoplogy or with nion manifold neighbours(share the common boundary with another face)

Which face you are refereing to. The upper face or or side faces.

[-mAx-]

upper faces (z=constant)