|
[Sponsors] |
October 14, 2010, 08:20 |
Examine Mesh Quality
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Mohsin Mukhtar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Korea
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello
In Gambit "examine mesh" form, the worst element of my model has an aspect ratio of 67 and the equiangle and equiside skew value of 0.84. (Below 0.85 equiangle value is considered ok). But in my case equiangle skewness is ok but Aspect ratio is 67 which is supposed to be under 10 (if I am right). Do we have to check all the "quality types" for the good mesh quality or 1 of them is ok? Please elaborate on this problem. I will be grateful. Mohsin |
|
October 31, 2013, 11:53 |
|
#2 |
New Member
giovanni
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi, I have a similar problem, i have a good quality for equiangle skew (0,14), but i have aspect ratio =50000 for the worst element in a turbolent case. Is it possible??
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh | chelvistero | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | January 15, 2010 19:43 |
quality of the mesh | u k jha | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | May 6, 2009 13:44 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 18:10 |
mesh quality: urgent | Madhukar Rapaka | FLUENT | 2 | June 8, 2006 09:43 |
mesh quality metrics | Novak Elliott | FLUENT | 1 | September 1, 2003 04:54 |