|
[Sponsors] |
January 21, 2011, 10:06 |
|
#61 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
How now? i am lost :'(
|
|
January 21, 2011, 12:13 |
|
#62 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
go and check face.2606
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
January 21, 2011, 22:29 |
|
#63 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
what do u want me do with it? merge with 2384?
|
|
January 24, 2011, 02:08 |
|
#64 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
if you read the warnings , it says that face.2606 has less than 3 nodes on its outer edges. And can Gambit has difficulty to mesh this face.
So try to mesh this face with finer resolution (eg: more nodes). Then, as you are in this area check face.2608 and especially sharp angle at vertex.4198. Here you will have to merge face.2608 with face 2547 This kind of operations is typical
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
January 27, 2011, 07:25 |
|
#65 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
ok max, i cant even continue with i know nothing. Now i need to know what i have done actually. So, i redo everything again
1) I import my stp file. 2) I unite all the Volume. 3) I create the surrounding volume. 4) I subtract it. and i get the pic below Now i explain this picture then u grade me is it what i done is correct. remember that first time i told u that the geometry isnt correct due to the hole? Now maybe i get it, the hole is the solid that i subtract of, which mean i am not going to mesh there, but just what i have subtracted (which is the air and the adjacent surface the air contact to) right? |
|
January 27, 2011, 07:51 |
|
#66 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
yep
Just for you information: you gonna mesh a complex geometry, especially for a beginner. So don't give up
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
January 27, 2011, 09:14 |
|
#67 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
Hmm, i have found out that from previous what have i done, i had unite all the volume become 1. Lets assume after i mesh it, i need to define boundary condition. Isn't it very tedious as my boundary condition is very complex too. Is it now i have to define it first?
Here, i have upload another image about my boundary condition. |
|
January 27, 2011, 09:36 |
|
#68 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
Defining boundary conditions is just picking surfaces.
So you can choose them at the end. You don't need to define the rest as wall since gambit will automatically do it for you I am not sure modeling the inlet fan is a good idea for a first try.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
January 27, 2011, 09:44 |
|
#69 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
huh, but i need that in my project.
|
|
January 27, 2011, 09:54 |
|
#70 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
Then go and mesh what you have.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
January 27, 2011, 10:44 |
|
#71 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
Before that, i got few question to ask.
When i import my step file, i done some modification on it, that is, moving the PSU abit lower, so that the hole cannot be seen(i sure this is what i need, as that is the casing part that close the PSU itself. then i unite it as usual, it can unite, but 2 message coming out. WARN : Problematic geometry reported in volume 1. (volume 1 is the only volume left after i unite) WARN : There are output entities with badly checking geometry. why? |
|
January 27, 2011, 10:53 |
|
#72 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
No idea since I don't have the model (and I cannot reproduce it)
But this is just warning, so you can continue
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
January 27, 2011, 10:59 |
|
#73 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
ok, now i create a volume(i guess if i create it same size as the largest volume(this case is casing) will make me easier as i dont need to spilt the volume to make the size smaller again right?
|
|
January 27, 2011, 11:14 |
|
#74 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
I don't understand waht you mean
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
January 27, 2011, 11:16 |
|
#75 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
isnt it now i have to create a volume and subtract with the original volume so i can get fluid that i want to mesh? about the volume i want to create, is it i create it at the same size with the casing?
|
|
January 27, 2011, 11:21 |
|
#76 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
yes, but not smaller.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
January 27, 2011, 11:25 |
|
#77 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
i done it. Here d pic,
but what is the 4 volume coming out for? |
|
January 27, 2011, 13:39 |
|
#78 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
should be isolated "fluid"-volumes, but not direct connected with the main one
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
January 29, 2011, 10:51 |
|
#79 |
Member
no183
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 15 |
wat shud i do with that bro?
|
|
January 31, 2011, 02:15 |
|
#80 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
delete them
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[GAMBIT] 3D boundary layer and meshing problem in GAMBIT 2.4.6 | prashanthreddyh | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | December 20, 2011 01:35 |
Boundary layer meshing problem in Gambit | Crystal | FLUENT | 0 | June 12, 2009 21:58 |
GAMBIT problem with 3D Boundary Layer when meshing | Anthony Haroutunian | FLUENT | 2 | March 26, 2008 03:02 |
Help Urgent about changing boundary condition | Anjum Naveed | FLUENT | 7 | August 14, 2006 13:25 |
Boundary Layer Meshing of a nosecone | Chris | FLUENT | 1 | March 15, 2005 13:42 |