- **FLUENT**
(*https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/fluent/*)

- - **Turbulence Model and limitation to Reynolds number**
(*https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/fluent/84248-turbulence-model-limitation-reynolds-number.html*)

Turbulence Model and limitation to Reynolds numberHello,
I am modeling heat transfer in a two-pass trapezoidal channe using Fluent. The Reynolds number at the inlet is 9400. I used low-Re k-epsilon model, RNG k-epsilon model, realisable k-epsilon model, standard k-omega model and SST k-omega model of Fluent to model turbulence. The comparison of numerical results with experiemnts shows that low-Re k-epsilon model is most accurate. The litrature on the other hand shows that SST k-omega model is the best. What can be the reason that I am not coming to the same conclusion as researchs have shown in the literature. Is there any limitation with respect to the Reynolds number in the choice of a particular turbulence model? |

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:50. |