large y+ with enhanced wall treatment

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 June 1, 2011, 22:00 large y+ with enhanced wall treatment #1 New Member   Kan Rui Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 7 Rep Power: 8 Sponsored Links Hi everyone, In fluent help it's said that though enhanced wall treatment requires y+~1, it should not be too bad if y+ is larger. I've been calculating heat transfer in a ribbed channel with the RNG k-e model and the enhance wall treatment. I found y+ on the edge of the rib sometimes can be higher than 5 but most of the wall has a yplus of the order of 1. I'm trying to figure out if this is ok, can you give me some advice? hanxsi likes this.

 June 2, 2011, 02:28 #2 Senior Member     Amir Join Date: May 2009 Location: Montreal, QC Posts: 739 Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 16 Hi Kan, you have to notice the average y+ over walls.(you can calculate it in FLUENT) it is said that in enhanced wall function, y+ should be lower than 5 but in many cases 10 is also acceptable, but not more than that. the another important tip that you have to notice is that in such problems (heat transfer in turbulent flow) it's much more better to use node based gradients instead of cell based. mrenergy likes this.

 June 2, 2011, 05:15 #3 Super Moderator   Sijal Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Islamabad Posts: 4,329 Blog Entries: 6 Rep Power: 45 basically enhanced wall treatment is made with the intension to lower the yplus effects on results (that is yplus sensitivity). So If you have the yplus ranging from 1 to 10 at different parts, your results will not change. In other words if you have meshes with yplus less than 1 every where and second mesh with yplus varying fron 1 to 10, the results will always be same bhajneets and mrenergy like this.

June 2, 2011, 10:05
#4
New Member

Kan Rui
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 8
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Amir Hi Kan, you have to notice the average y+ over walls.(you can calculate it in FLUENT) it is said that in enhanced wall function, y+ should be lower than 5 but in many cases 10 is also acceptable, but not more than that. the another important tip that you have to notice is that in such problems (heat transfer in turbulent flow) it's much more better to use node based gradients instead of cell based.
thanks, I will have a try.

May 7, 2012, 05:19
#5
Member

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 7
Hi,

I am also simulating a 2d ribbed channel heat transfer problem(to simplify the solution i simulate half of the channel), and i am using SST k-w model, but when i compare my Nusselt number with experimental Nusslet number i get wrong results.

I am using air temperature as temperature reference value, and the hydraulic diameter of the channel as a length reference value.

This a picture of mesh and geometry.

Any help will be totally appreciated.
Attached Images
 mesh.jpg (74.8 KB, 30 views) geometry.jpg (14.1 KB, 8 views)

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Arnoldinho OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 38 March 8, 2017 14:48 jlb001 FLUENT 6 December 27, 2014 06:56 mmmiichaalll FLUENT 4 March 30, 2010 05:10 ndabir CFX 1 March 10, 2010 07:21 Hugo FLUENT 0 January 11, 2007 10:52