
[Sponsors] 
June 28, 2011, 05:07 
some question

#1 
Senior Member
hamid
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 185
Rep Power: 8 
Can I simulate two phases flow with VOF in steady state ?
in grid independency study for UNSTEADY flow , how should I consider the time steps in every simulation, i mean i have grid1 with X amount of grids and grid2 with 3X and grid3 with 9X and i compare them, but should I consider different time steps as well? 

June 28, 2011, 06:59 

#2 
Senior Member
Svetlin Filipov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 10 
there is a kind of unwritten rule  time step is of a magnitude of that allows short phenomena modeling.
it depends on the processes you are going to model and bigger mesh not always results in smaller timestep At the beginning try to use one and the same timestep. If not applicable  divide by 2 each time. 

June 28, 2011, 07:54 

#3 
Senior Member
hamid
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 185
Rep Power: 8 
Hi Philipov
Apparently denser mesh needs smaller time step (due to courant number), is it true? As I understood u mean I better to use the same time step for all three meshes , X,3X,9X, ? thank u Hamid 

June 28, 2011, 09:56 

#4 
Senior Member
Svetlin Filipov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 10 
As a starting point Yes and if you do not obtain convergence reduce timestep by factor of 2 until you get convergence and proper results.


June 30, 2011, 10:06 

#5 
Member
Adrien Lemoine
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Paris,France
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 8 
Hi,
if you have a problems due to the courant number (which means you are using an explicit VOF scheme) then you should switch to an Implicit VOF scheme whch gives good results and is easier to use. You should start with an time around 103 s. If you really want to stay with a explicit VOF scheme then you should calculate the time step with this formula : Time step < Size of the smallest cell / Speed of sound in your phase. Adrien
__________________
 Plz add reputation if the answer is correct A cœur vaillant rien d'impossible  

June 30, 2011, 11:21 

#6 
Senior Member
Svetlin Filipov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 10 
I will a little disagree with the last comment as far as in air speed of sound is about 342m/s and if you have a cell size of 0.1m in X direction (for example) then you need dt of 3.0E04 .
From last post seems that the task is independent from velocity. Dont you think velocity of 1m/s; 10m/s and 100 m/s does not matter?!?!?! 

June 30, 2011, 16:38 

#7 
Member
Adrien Lemoine
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Paris,France
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 8 
Hi Philipov,
I forgot one thing in my last post : This formula will always make your scheme stable since the velocity will be always under the speed of sound. If you are 100% sure that the maxspeed will be for exemple 50 m/s (EVERYWHERE) then you can calculate the time step with : Time step < Size of the smallest cell / 50. The formula "Time step < Size of the smallest cell / Speed of sound in your phase" is always true but not always the quickest. Sincerly Adrien
__________________
 Plz add reputation if the answer is correct A cœur vaillant rien d'impossible  

July 1, 2011, 03:02 

#8  
Senior Member
Svetlin Filipov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 10 
Quote:


July 2, 2011, 16:28 

#9 
New Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 8 
Hey,
if you have problems with the Courant number. You could also try to decrease the under relaxation factors a little bit. That would cause a slower simulation but does not effect the speed so much like decreasing the time step. 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
question about uds  tanven  FLUENT  2  July 5, 2015 11:22 
Unanswered question  niklas  OpenFOAM  2  July 31, 2013 16:03 
Question about Table applicaiton.  universez  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  0  January 12, 2010 21:31 
CHANNEL FLOW: a question and a request  Carlos  Main CFD Forum  4  August 23, 2002 05:55 
question  K.L.Huang  Siemens  1  March 29, 2000 04:57 