|
[Sponsors] |
July 24, 2011, 20:06 |
RNG k-e vs Standard
|
#1 |
New Member
mohamed
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 16 |
is the RNG k-e model shows better performance than the standard k-e model in the prediction of heat transfer
|
|
July 25, 2011, 07:18 |
|
#2 |
Member
anonym
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 17 |
It depends on the flow. Is the assumption of the standard k-e model valid: isotropic turbulence? If your flow is swirling/the turbulence is highly anisotropic, you should go for the RNG model.
|
|
July 25, 2011, 17:01 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
mohamed
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
thank you very much for response in my problem flow is incompressible using k-e is valid it isn't swirling my question is general ? |
||
July 25, 2011, 17:07 |
|
#4 |
Member
anonym
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 17 |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
convergence with RNG k-e model | MAC | FLUENT | 0 | October 20, 2007 07:39 |
why RNG k-e is better & what does RNG really mean? | Bonnie White | FLUENT | 1 | August 8, 2006 10:14 |
HELP!! Prandtl numbers in RNG k-e turbulence model | maoasis | FLUENT | 0 | April 24, 2006 11:51 |
RNG with Schemit number | zwdi | FLUENT | 0 | August 2, 2004 12:54 |
About RNG k-e | Giovanni Ieria | FLUENT | 1 | January 31, 2000 12:04 |