CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

hello to all

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 25, 2011, 07:50
Default hello to all
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 8
hadieliasi is on a distinguished road
in your opinion the mesh size of a problem is difference with that problem with for example 0.01 scale?
i think this is a joke but i am confused about it?
for example you suppose that you have two problems :
1-flow around a sphere with 1 meter diameter
2- same problem with .01 meter diameter
so,what is the sale of minimum mesh size for each other? is the ratio 0.01 or about it?
i applogize everyone due to my bad english and i wish i could get my goal.
hadieliasi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 25, 2011, 20:53
Senior Member
Stuart Buckingham
Join Date: May 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 267
Rep Power: 19
stuart23 will become famous soon enoughstuart23 will become famous soon enough
Unfortunatly there is no blanket rule for mesh sizing. You will need to already predict some characteristics about the flow and then decide where you want higher resolution and therefore more cells. For the topics you mentioned, you probably want a refined wake behind the sphere to capture the unsteady nature of the flow. Mesh sizing is usually just a compromise between accuracy vs time to solve and computational resources.

stuart23 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:08.