|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Daniel Lai Ern Yoong
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Hi everyone, i am currently doing my undergrad and i get this topic (heat pipe) for my final year project...... Just wanna ask whether cfx or fluent is easier to use to model the boiling part of the working fluid in it. Any suggestion??
for the heating part, do i need to draw a heating medium to contact to the pipe?? or juz put the boundary condition of the heat pipe wall as heat flux in to serve as a heating source?? type of working fluid: water type of HP material: copper and there is very thin porous domain in the heat pipe to simplify things.... i'm running out of time, hope anyone in this forum can give some suggestion and guidance.... thanks in advance... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Double pipe heat exchanger | mohcin | FLUENT | 21 | June 18, 2016 14:19 |
Evaporation and heat pipes | Energy | FLUENT | 6 | November 5, 2011 10:50 |
Natural convection - Inlet boundary condition | max91 | CFX | 1 | July 29, 2008 20:28 |
Convective Heat Transfer - Heat Exchanger | Mark | CFX | 6 | November 15, 2004 15:55 |
fluid flow fundas | ram | Main CFD Forum | 5 | June 17, 2000 21:31 |