|
[Sponsors] |
March 31, 2015, 22:37 |
|
#41 |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
||
March 31, 2015, 22:55 |
|
#42 |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
I read it before but i could not find my answers that is the reason i ask here, i wish someone who has the experience help me, sometimes the answers are not clearly available in userguids. any way, thank you for the suggestions
|
|
March 31, 2015, 23:20 |
|
#43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 892
Rep Power: 18 |
The Fluent developers have gone to a great deal of effort to create the user's guide, and this documentation should be your first point of reference. Use the contents of the document to navigate to relevant sections (similar to a textbook).
Here's the name of sections that correspond to your questions (all in the "Modeling Discrete Phase" chapter): Quote:
"Step-by-Step Reporting of Trajectories" shows you this task exactly. |
||
April 16, 2015, 13:29 |
|
#44 | |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
Hello , I got the particle tracks. but the particles positions are not what i expected to be in turbulent flow. Could u please tell me which part of the model i need to work to get better results for the particles movements. (now, the particles are moving in straight line but i expect the particles near wall move toward the center of the tube) Thanks |
||
April 29, 2015, 11:20 |
|
#45 |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello
would u please help me how can i include particle particle interaction in the model? Thanks |
|
April 29, 2015, 22:08 |
|
#46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 892
Rep Power: 18 |
For four-way coupling (includes particle-particle interactions) you could try using the DEM collision model in Fluent within DPM. This DEM collision model is for modelling granular particulates, or similar large particles. If you want to include other interaction forces besides physical collisions (for example between colloidal particles) you may need to create your own UDFs for this functionality.
|
|
May 3, 2015, 22:36 |
|
#47 | |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
Thanks for the respond. I could not find DEM in user guide. Could u tell me how can i activate it? Thanks |
||
May 4, 2015, 01:23 |
|
#48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 892
Rep Power: 18 |
Check the chapter on "Modeling Discrete Phase". Specifically, section "24.2.5.12. Modeling Collision Using the DEM Model" (for ANSYS Fluent 15.0 Users Guide; might be a different number for another version).
|
|
May 4, 2015, 10:53 |
|
#49 | |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
1.just not sure if i need to use granular or interfacial in secondary phase?! my secondary phase are solid particles (4e-8m), heat and mass and momentum are important phenomena in my case. 2. to consider the particle particle interaction should i choose Coalescence Kernal and Breakage Kernel in interfacial case? what about the granular case, should i choose the radial distribution? Thank u |
||
May 4, 2015, 11:01 |
|
#50 |
New Member
masoudeh
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
By the way i read in the limitation of the Eulerian model that it can not consider particle particle interactions! so by choosing Coalescence Kernal and Breakage Kernel can i activate this interaction?
|
|
May 4, 2015, 18:28 |
|
#51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 892
Rep Power: 18 |
I'm not familiar with these Kernel methods, have you read the Theory Guide?
The chapter I directed you to was on the Discrete Phase Model (DPM) which tracks particles in the Lagrangian reference frame. Your continuous phase is tracked in the Eulerian reference frame which makes it an Euler-Lagrange model overall. |
|
April 9, 2016, 01:33 |
fsi problem
|
#52 |
New Member
hamid
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
hello all
i'm working on a fsi problem and want to set lagrangian-eulerian mesh to my domain. how should i do that? thanks in advance hamid |
|
April 14, 2016, 05:01 |
fluidized bed simulation issues
|
#53 |
New Member
Nuha
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 10 |
i m working on a gas-solid-liquid fluidized bed .Its Geometry is a simple 2D cylindrical column. I have used eulerian-lagrangian approach to track the solid particles. As per this approach dense discrete particle model (DDPM) with DEM collisions is used in fluent 15.0.
During simulation as a first step , i kept gas velocity equal to zero in boundary conditions & selected surface injections in DDPM to inject solids from bottom of column i.e from gas inlet. I have to inject 800 particles which will give 0.25 m static bed height (as per literature), but in my case only 0.125 m static bed height is obtained. Kindly let me know how could i get the required 0.25 m static bed height just after the surface injection? Secondly, just to see the phenomena of fluidization at 0.125 m static bed height, i gave following boundary conditions: • 1.4 m/s gas velocity as inlet boundary condition from bottom of cylinder • 0.012 m/s liquid velocity from top as inlet BC • -0.02783 m/s liquid velocity from gas inlet • “Reflect” as solid collision type in DPM with “Anthracite” as collision partner • No slip condition for both solids & gas • Pressure as outlet boundary condition Upon simulating it, i didn't get a proper fluidized bed rather a packed bed moving upward as a lump is obtained, which isn't matching to any of fluidization stage. Kindly tell me where is the actual problem, either in BC , injections or in selecting drag laws? |
|
September 16, 2016, 05:03 |
How to enter the number of particles in DPM Injection?
|
#54 |
New Member
Abdulrajak Buradi
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Dear Sir,
I want know how to enter the number of particles in DPM Injection, and were I should specify the number of particles. |
|
September 17, 2016, 03:09 |
Discrete phase modeling
|
#55 |
New Member
Prashanth
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 9 |
Hiii ,
am looking particle residence time in the flow field. Along with the water and injecting some 5 microns diameter of particles with a velocity of 0.042m/s, here i have not mentioned the total mass flow rate in the injection frame. Is this mainly affect to the flow field and am getting confuse with how to calculate total mass flow rate. Currently, injection time am calculating based on the particle velocity(0.0425m/s) and my domain length(5m) soo travel to this length it needs approximately 117s. IS this correct. Please let me know am worried too much. |
|
September 17, 2016, 03:11 |
|
#56 | |
New Member
Prashanth
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
am looking particle residence time in the flow field. Along with the water and injecting some 5 microns diameter of particles with a velocity of 0.042m/s, here i have not mentioned the total mass flow rate in the injection frame. Is this mainly affect to the flow field and am getting confuse with how to calculate total mass flow rate. Currently, injection time am calculating based on the particle velocity(0.0425m/s) and my domain length(5m) soo travel to this length it needs approximately 117s. IS this correct. Please let me know am worried too much. |
||
February 13, 2017, 04:34 |
|
#57 |
New Member
Zari Musavi
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi,
looking for my questions, I saw this discussion, and appreciate if you explain me how 'the number of particle streams' should be set? I have these inputs: -total injection flow rate (1.5 e-4 kg/s) -the injection hole diameter (0.1 mm) -injection type (pressure swirl atomizer) should I approximate the particle diameter to set the number of the streams? or is it a mesh-related parameter? or the statistical convergence issue? thank you in advance. Zari |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 05:36 |
Does lagrangian track model support moving mesh with topological changes?? | su_junwei | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | October 18, 2012 03:53 |
Lagrangian Particle Tracking model In CFX | Kushagra | CFX | 8 | December 2, 2010 21:18 |
eulerian model | mvee | FLUENT | 1 | December 6, 2007 11:47 |
DPM + Eulerian Model | Shane | FLUENT | 2 | July 14, 2004 08:26 |