# Convergence and Solver Selection

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
 January 9, 2012, 23:38 Convergence and Solver Selection #1 New Member   Join Date: Nov 2011 Posts: 5 Rep Power: 7 Sponsored Links I have created a gas distributor with high back pressure and a choked inlet distributing into a vacuum (the operating pressure is not quite zero, but very close). Using the pressure-based solver, I have attempted to solve. The model always diverges. No matter how much I play with the under-relaxation factors, it simply won't converge. Should I be using the density solver over the pressure solver? I am aware of the relative merits of each, but don't know what to do for this situation. The flow is slow near the inlet, but definitely compressible by the exit. It seems to fall between the two solvers, but maybe one is better than the other? I should mention that the model is very complicated, as the distributor has many exits. A simpler model does converge using the pressure solver, but the real one does not. Thanks!
 Sponsored Links

 January 10, 2012, 03:38 #2 Senior Member   duri Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 160 Rep Power: 9 Operating pressure doesn't matter for pressure based solver, if it is zero it will take a negative value. When compressibility effects are large (discharging into vacuum) you need to move to density based solver.

 January 14, 2012, 01:34 #3 Senior Member   Lucky Tran Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Orlando, FL USA Posts: 1,879 Rep Power: 26 The density based solver is preferred over the pressure based solver, especially for compressible flows. The density based solver is more complicated and costly compared to the pressure based solver but is much more physically accurate. The pressure based solver can still be used but requires a lot more care. If you are using the pressure based solver, did you remember to account for the viscous heating effects caused by the shear?

 January 22, 2012, 14:21 #4 New Member   Join Date: Nov 2011 Posts: 5 Rep Power: 7 What do you mean by this? I did turn on the energy model and did then chose low-pressure boundary slip because it is exiting into what is essentially a vacuum. Is this what you are referring to?

 January 22, 2012, 14:34 #5 Senior Member   Lucky Tran Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Orlando, FL USA Posts: 1,879 Rep Power: 26 You should be using the density solver. If you want to use the pressure based solver, in addition to simply 'turning on energy' you need to account for viscous heating effects.

 Tags converge, density based solver, diverge, pressure based solver, solver

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Centurion2011 FLUENT 44 June 20, 2017 09:57 icemaniac178 CFX 1 March 30, 2011 19:11 nasdak CFX 2 June 29, 2009 01:17 Amir FLUENT 0 April 18, 2006 06:21 Henrik StrĂ¶m FLUENT 1 October 29, 2005 03:57

 Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top