|
[Sponsors] |
February 10, 2012, 04:28 |
entrance length
|
#1 |
Senior Member
hamid
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 185
Rep Power: 15 |
hi
i have a question, in case of considering a pipe with pressure b.c. do we need to consider the ""entrance length" ? what about the other type of b.c? thank u |
|
February 10, 2012, 05:47 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana, US
Posts: 186
Rep Power: 17 |
If by entrance length you mean an extended domain before the pipe inlet, then yes you need to for all types of BC's , unless you have a fully developed profile that you'll use as the inlet BC.
Regards Luke |
|
February 10, 2012, 06:56 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
hamid
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 185
Rep Power: 15 |
thanks Luke for the reply
im a bit confused, i have a T shape pipe and I know the pressure in openings of the pipe (the bc), shall i consider the pipe larger than it is to have a fully developed regime, or pressure bc will by default consider all the "normal gradient" zero, so by this assumption of fluent, the flow is fully developed, for example in case of using velocity inlet bc, one have to consider the le=0.06 Re as length until the flow become fully developed in laminar regime.... |
|
February 10, 2013, 06:27 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Ben
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 13 |
I, too, am curious about this consideration of the entrance length as I have a similar T pipe configuration.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulence length scale and integral length scale | rizhang | CFX | 2 | April 22, 2016 07:22 |
Turbulent Characteristic Length/Turbulent Length Scale | fluentnoob | FLUENT | 2 | July 3, 2009 08:40 |
entrance length | snowshovel | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 15, 2008 08:46 |
DPM: Particle Tracking | Madhukar | FLUENT | 1 | July 24, 2007 03:51 |