CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Hardware

Computer configuration for CFD

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By flotus1
  • 1 Post By JBeilke

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 1, 2017, 04:34
Default Computer configuration for CFD
  #1
New Member
 
Luca
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
luca.s is on a distinguished road
Hello there,
I am just approaching CFD and the forum, and looking for some advices.
I am a member of a research group at University and we need to work on different models using Delft3D and OpenFOAM softwares. We have a 6000 € budget to purchase an assembled desktop computer.
Do you have any advice on a good one for that prize?
Which are the best options, according to you?
Thank you so much.
Luca
luca.s is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2017, 10:26
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
One of the reasons why you are not getting a response:
Now is a pretty bad time to buy a CFD workstation in this price range. Both AMD and Intel are currently in the process of releasing new processor generations. This would not be a big deal with the usual 5%-10% performance increase we saw between previous generations. But this time CFD performance per dollar should increase by 50% or more based on the specifications of these new CPUs.
So if you can wait for a few more weeks and the reliability of technically mature (read: older) hardware is not that important to you: hold your money.
BlnPhoenix likes this.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2017, 06:51
Default
  #3
Member
 
Jeff
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 9
jf_vt is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by flotus1 View Post
...this time CFD performance per dollar should increase by 50% or more based on the specifications of these new CPUs...
This will be quite a gain indeed
As a Non expert in the "hardware department", I will be very interested to have more insight on these gains and the best way to leverage them as I will be on a market for a new CFD rig next Year. What should I be looking for?
Thanks
JF
jf_vt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2017, 03:41
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 292
Rep Power: 13
BlnPhoenix is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jf_vt View Post
This will be quite a gain indeed
As a Non expert in the "hardware department", I will be very interested to have more insight on these gains and the best way to leverage them as I will be on a market for a new CFD rig next Year. What should I be looking for?
Thanks
JF

AMD is releasing Ryzen Threadripper (desktop) with 16 Cores and Ryzen Epyc (server) CPU's with up to 32 Cores these days. You should really watch out for those. Threadripper is $999 per chip which may be way cheaper than intels counterparts resp. getting you a lot more bang for the buck. As you said you have $6000 to spend i guess EPYC CPUs is the category you want to compare with Intel's XEON CPUs. Many companys have said to switch to AMD now because of the disruption caused by AMDs ZEN technology.
BlnPhoenix is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 9, 2017, 02:13
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Joern Beilke
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dresden
Posts: 498
Rep Power: 20
JBeilke is on a distinguished road
It will be interesting to see the comparison between a 16 core Threadripper and a 16 core Epyc. Higher clock speed vs. more memory chanels.
hospital0968 likes this.
JBeilke is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 10, 2017, 09:31
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Xavation
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 9
xava is on a distinguished road
The first Threadripper Euler3D benchmarks were just published at tomshardware, for what is it worth it for your worklaod. You can read it all here
xava is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 10, 2017, 09:39
Default
  #7
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
Yeah, we've had that topic already. The "Euler CFD" results on that site are implausible.
I also had a quick chat with one of their editors a while ago. They have no intention to look into this issue.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 10, 2017, 09:52
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Xavation
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 9
xava is on a distinguished road
Jup, read that. Is there currently a benchmark out there, which better reflects the 'real' cfd workloads?
xava is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 10, 2017, 12:06
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Have a nice time!
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: mech.eng.ahmedmansour@gmail.com
Posts: 291
Rep Power: 11
Ahmed Saeed Mansour is on a distinguished road
Hello, I need to run a mesh which has about 5 million cells using Fluent, what is the good CPU that can run this simulation fast? I need the type, number of cores, processors and prices...
Thanks
Ahmed Saeed Mansour is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Using Remote Solve Manager for Single Computer u2berggeist ANSYS 1 May 21, 2016 21:01
Computer Configuration utkarsh7pb FLUENT 0 September 19, 2013 11:36
CFD computer configuration Motorz Hardware 0 December 10, 2012 15:02
Multiple Configuration Simulation Tristan CFX 0 November 13, 2009 23:01
Computer Configuration for CFX5.7.1 ? freshman CFX 2 July 16, 2005 04:01


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:59.