CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Hardware

AMD EPYC 7281 (32 MB L2 cache) vs 7301 (64 MB cache)?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 9, 2018, 15:00
Default AMD EPYC 7281 (32 MB L2 cache) vs 7301 (64 MB cache)?
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 6
zwilhoit is on a distinguished road
Very impressed with the performance from Epyc here.

I'm trying to save $300 on my FloTHERM build by using the 7281 (32 MB L2 cache) instead of the 7301 (64 MB cache).

Think the cache size difference matters for CFD? I'm guessing not. Maybe it does for Keyshot (ray-tracing) however.

Last edited by wyldckat; November 12, 2018 at 17:06. Reason: Gave link to the thread where this had been posted originally
zwilhoit is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD Epyc CFD benchmarks with Ansys Fluent flotus1 Hardware 55 November 12, 2018 05:33
AMD Ryzen Threadripper vs Intel Xeon, importance of cache and memory channels JohnMartinGodo Hardware 4 March 21, 2018 12:07
DPMFoam - Serious Error --particle-laden flow in simple geometric config benz25 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 27 December 19, 2017 20:47
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 05:36
OpenFOAM 13 AMD quadcore parallel results msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 November 10, 2007 23:23

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:47.