|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There have been lot of discussion about CDS being unstable due to the reason that it can give unphysical oscilation in solution. I was wondering whether this is the reason for it:
when we descretise the equations we get (ap_conv + ap_diff) phi_p = sum(a_i * phi_neigh) + SU now if (ap_conv + ap_diff) ~ 0 we get very high values of phi_p if we are solving by gauss seidel etc. that is we can not write the equation as : phi_p = ( sum(a_i * phi_neigh) + SU) / (ap_conv + ap_diff) as needed by Gauss Seidel. Is this the reason for unstablity. Could someone comment on it. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm wondering: "raaxz" means "zxaar" ?
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
No i did not post it. But its good observation
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
U r correct its reverse of zxaar, because it came to my mind when i was reading some message by zxaar, so could not think of different name to put on, so just used reverse of it.
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
!noitanigami fo kcaL
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Turbulent channel flow | roberthino | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | August 15, 2007 09:35 |
| [Commercial meshers] Converting meshes that includes interfaces | ham | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 29 | January 8, 2007 09:58 |
| Better to use QUICK than CDS for my case? | Ben | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 18, 2006 10:30 |
| van leer and cds scheme for LES smc | fabian | Main CFD Forum | 2 | March 31, 2006 03:22 |
| A thought on Wall Y+ | Sham | FLUENT | 1 | May 18, 2005 01:48 |