|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am relatively new to CFD. I want to use 3D mesh for some computational work on Wind turbines. If I have to sacrifice some grid points to reduce the run-time, which direction should I choose to coarsen the grid without affecting much of the final output? Usually which directions are more important to be fine-meshed than the other? Thanks a lot for your help.
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Removing points along the blade's span would be the place to start. You need points off the blade to resolve the boundary layer and points in the chordwise direction to resolve transition or other phenomena.
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear John Chawner, Thanks a lot for your delicate response. I appreciate your suggestions. Would you please explain the grid directional importance a little more or give me links to some reference books, papers or articles. Waiting for your kind response and thanking you in anticipation.
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MapFields to New Grid For Extreme Grid Deformations due to Body Motion | albcem | OpenFOAM | 0 | May 5, 2009 15:17 |
| Obtain Geometry Data from a Grid File in CFX 10.0 | ARJUN | CFX | 2 | August 17, 2006 08:20 |
| Grid refinement. | Sas | Main CFD Forum | 8 | September 2, 2005 09:36 |
| Loading transient data of moving grid | leo | Siemens | 3 | April 9, 2003 02:35 |
| Numerical methods for discontinuous grid interfaces? | Hansong Hang | Main CFD Forum | 12 | September 16, 1998 23:26 |