CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

criteria for a simulation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 3, 2012, 22:49
Default criteria for a simulation
  #1
Member
 
Bharatt's Avatar
 
Bharat
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Delhi, India
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 14
Bharatt is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone

I am runng simulation for 2D airfoil with using FLUENT for the calculation of lift and drag coeffcient for different AoA (0 to 16 degree) scince my main objective is to compare the lift and drag coefficient curve for different AoA and different tubulence models, i would be very thankful if anyone can explain me the excat number of iterations to run this simulation/ what is the excat criteria to run this simulation is it okay to stop the solution as soon as the convergence is achieved or do i have to wait for them to stable upto what point

for example, i am running for Spalart-Allmaras and my residuals covergence is set to Xe-4 and its achieved, but my coefficients are not converged or i can say that they are still going down. do i have to lower my residuals and continue till they become constant? or is it okay to stop there as i am comparing the coeffcients for different AoA's?

thanks in advance
Bharatt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 4, 2012, 23:16
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Smith Wang
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: China
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15
jksmnh is on a distinguished road
In your case there are a lot of causes,such as your mesh quality which is not good enough, unreasonable boundary conditions.
jksmnh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 4, 2012, 23:37
Default
  #3
Member
 
Bharatt's Avatar
 
Bharat
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Delhi, India
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 14
Bharatt is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jksmnh View Post
In your case there are a lot of causes,such as your mesh quality which is not good enough, unreasonable boundary conditions.
Hello smith,

Thanks for the reply. in my case i am using hybrid mesh(unstructured near the airfoil and structured away from it). i would like to know the criteria in general for any simulation. suppose in my case the solution is converged by 300iterations and my coefficients doesn't become constant, so do i have to run another set of iterations till they(coefficeints) become constant.
Bharatt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 5, 2012, 03:08
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Joern Beilke
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dresden
Posts: 498
Rep Power: 20
JBeilke is on a distinguished road
Forget the convergence criterium. It doesn't tell you anything.
JBeilke is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 5, 2012, 09:14
Default
  #5
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 15
Jeremie84 is on a distinguished road
Hello Bharatt,

Since you are interested in the force coefficients (lift and drag), the residuals should not be your only convergence criteria. Of course, it's good that your residuals decrease by at least 2 or 3 orders of magnitude, but you also have to monitor your lift and drag coefficients and check that they converge (for example, I know that in the aeronautical industry, the drag prediction should be within 1 dc or drag count which corresponds to 10^-4, but in your case I don't know the precision you wish to reach).

In the Residual Monitors window, you can disable Check Convergence for all your residuals. By doing this, your simulation won't stop before the end of the number of iterations you set.

Hope this helps

Regards,

Jeremie
Jeremie84 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 5, 2012, 12:35
Default
  #6
Member
 
Bharatt's Avatar
 
Bharat
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Delhi, India
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 14
Bharatt is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeremie84 View Post
Hello Bharatt,

Since you are interested in the force coefficients (lift and drag), the residuals should not be your only convergence criteria. Of course, it's good that your residuals decrease by at least 2 or 3 orders of magnitude, but you also have to monitor your lift and drag coefficients and check that they converge (for example, I know that in the aeronautical industry, the drag prediction should be within 1 dc or drag count which corresponds to 10^-4, but in your case I don't know the precision you wish to reach).

In the Residual Monitors window, you can disable Check Convergence for all your residuals. By doing this, your simulation won't stop before the end of the number of iterations you set.

Hope this helps

Regards,

Jeremie
Hey Jeremie,

Thanks for your reply, that made pretty much clear that i should concentrate on the objectives not on the residuals like in my case the decimal point for drag is upto 3. thanks again

bharat
Bharatt is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Solar Radiation in OpenFOAM plainstyle OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 15 July 8, 2014 04:43
Simulation of a complex wing in solidworks flow simulation niels1900 FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM 6 April 20, 2011 10:44
GUI crash and simulation engine still running RPJones FLOW-3D 2 November 9, 2010 08:18
velocity profile export from a simulation onto another sudhirlv STAR-CCM+ 1 September 12, 2010 18:57
strange simulation error Ralf Schmidt FLUENT 2 May 4, 2007 13:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:04.