
[Sponsors] 
Teta term in Menter's Momentum thickness Reynolds number equation for transition 

LinkBack  Thread Tools  Search this Thread  Display Modes 
June 28, 2012, 18:56 
Teta term in Menter's Momentum thickness Reynolds number equation for transition

#1 
New Member
Adrian
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 13 
Hi, I'm currently undertaking a task of implementing the gammaRe transition formulation for turbulence modelling by way of a UDF in Fluent.
I've come across a problem. There's lambda term in used for prediction of transition onset, denoted lambda underscore theta. In the formulation of this term, a parameter given by a capital theta is required. (equation 28 in Langtry & Menter, 2009, 'Correlationbased transition modelling for unstructured parallelized computations CFD') The problem is, that in all the literature I have looked in, no correlation or formulation for this term is given. As you would expect, this has brough my progress to a standstill. I would be grateful if anyone could suggest where I might be able to look for an answer. Many thanks. 

June 28, 2012, 20:09 

#2 
Senior Member
Mehdi Baba Mehdi
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 14 
it should be calculated iteratively. you should take following step:
1guess teta (teta=0) 2find F(lateta) and Rethetat (from form. 3538) 3find theta from Retheta (Retheta=ru*theta*U/mu  you can see it in Nomenclature) 4go to step 2 and iterate until it converge. I hope I can explain it well. 

June 29, 2012, 09:53 

#3 
New Member
Adrian
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 13 
That makes it much clearer. Thanks very much.


June 29, 2012, 10:02 

#4 
New Member
Adrian
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 13 
Just one thing, to calculate theta in step three, which value for Retheta do I use? Do I make it equal to Rethetat?


June 29, 2012, 12:10 

#5 
Senior Member
Mehdi Baba Mehdi
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 14 
I am sorry, i made a mistake. In fact, Rethetat is true in step three instead of Retheta.


June 29, 2012, 12:35 

#6 
New Member
Adrian
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 13 
But then Rethetat is calculated using thetat, whereas lambdatheta is calculated using just theta.


June 29, 2012, 22:35 

#7 
Senior Member
Mehdi Baba Mehdi
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 14 
yes that is true, but in calculation of landa it was recommended to Theta= thatat. In fact, I have never understand why and in all paper and thesis I have read, never describe its reason.
if I complete my former reply, following steps can explain it better: (a) guess the initial value for Thetat (=0 was recommended) (b) calculate the Landa by setting Theta= thatat (c) calculate the Flanda (d) calculate the Rethetat (e) calculate the t from the definition of Thetat =(no/U)Ret. (f) go to step 2 and iterate until it converge. The calculation may converge in a few iterations. Last edited by mb.pejvak; June 30, 2012 at 01:11. 

July 1, 2012, 12:31 

#8 
New Member
Adrian
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 13 
I'll try that out. Many thanks for your help.


July 14, 2012, 15:29 

#9 
New Member
Adrian
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 13 
A friend of mine is also implementing the Transition formulation of Menter for the Spalart Allmaras turbulence model based on the paper by Medida and Baeder 'Application of the Correlation based gammaretet Transition Model to the SpalartAllmaras Turbulence model' and has encountered a problem with the blending function.
In the paper it is specified that the blending function is used to distinguish a wall boundary layer and a free shear layer to deactivate the production term in the wall boundary layer only. However, this function depends on the dissipation rate, which is not available in the SA model. The paper says that the blending function has been turned off manually, but does not explicitly specify how this is done. Can anyone suggest how this is done? Any help would be greatly appreciated. 

November 30, 2012, 19:30 

#10 
New Member
patty
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 14 
Adrian,
I am trying to put in the SA transition model currently also. I ran into the same problem with how to handle the F_theta blending function. Do you know how your friend ended up resolving that? 

Tags 
menter, omega, sst, transition 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Cell Reynolds Number  laliong  Main CFD Forum  12  September 17, 2019 03:18 
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap  bobburnquist  OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion  6  August 26, 2015 09:38 
Constant velocity of the material  Sas  CFX  15  July 13, 2010 08:56 
how to integrate this x momentum equation term  Prakash  Main CFD Forum  0  June 13, 2008 10:45 