CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Turbulence model parameters and equations

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 19, 2012, 11:02
Default Turbulence model parameters and equations
  #1
New Member
 
Maarten
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 14
Maximus91 is on a distinguished road
Dear CFD users,

Right now I´m working on a CFD computation for external flow around a very streamlined car.
I have some questions regarding the turbulence parameters. I´ll first specify what formulas I used to calculate some parameters. FYI, I use FineOpen of Numeca. I will either use the SA or Mentor-SST k –omega (Extended wall) model.

Description of the stream: A free steam around a car driving in the open i.e. on the road. So it is an external flow. The free stream velocity V_{\infty} is 25 m/s.

There are a couple parameters I have to specify in the CFD software program which im not complete sure about, being:

Boundary conditions:
for the k-omega model: k and \varepsilon
for the Spalart-Allmaras model: turbulent viscosity

Initial conditions:
for the k-omega model: k and \varepsilon
for the Spalart-Allmaras model: ratio \frac{\tilde{\nu}}{\nu} (taken as 1)
So it comes down to calculating/guestimating these parameters. I used the following formulas (all in SI units) to calculate these parameters:

U_{\tau}=\sqrt{\frac{\tau_{wall}}{\rho}}=\sqrt{0.5*V_{ref}^2*C_f} (From Numeca FineOpen manual)
C_f=\frac{0.027}{Re_x^{1/7}} (Also from FineOpen manual)
Re_x=\frac{\rho_{ref}*V_{ref}*L_{ref}}{\mu} with \mu being the dynamic (molecular) viscosity
k=\frac{\tau_{wall}}{\rho}*\frac{1}{C_{\mu}} with C_{\mu}=0.09 and \frac{\tau_{wall}}{\rho}=0.5*V_{ref}^2*C_f
\varepsilon=C_{\mu}*(\frac{\mu_t}{\mu})^{-1}*\frac{\rho_{ref}*k^2}{\mu} I took \frac{\mu_t}{\mu}=1 (Numeca specifies in the manual that a typical value for this ratio is 1 for external flows). So before I can calculate \varepsilon, I first calculate k.

Turbulent (eddy) viscosity \mu_t=C_{\mu}*\rho*\frac{k^2}{\varepsilon} (So before calculating this parameter, I first calculate k, then \varepsilon and then \mu_t)

Using the above mentioned formulas, I was able to calculate all the needed parameters. Still I’m not sure if these formulas are correct or maybe are not valid in every case.

However, when I just assume these formulas are correct I calculated k, \varepsilon=3075 and \mu_t. This yielded
k = 0.718, \varepsilon=3075 and \mu_t=1.85*10^-5. Do these values make sense in anyway, or are they completely out of range?

The actual reason I’m posting this question is to validate our computation. One year ago, a group performed the same computation for the exact same car. This yielded a drag force of about 40N. The problem we are having now is that the drag force is in the order of 10^4 Newton. Obviously this does not make sense. Right now the mesh I runned in FineOpen contains about 18 million cells with refinements near the car itself, behind the car, beneath the car etc. etc.

So what I’m specifically asking:
1) Can someone verify the method I use, especially the formulas I use
2) What may cause the problem of a way too high drag value?
3) Do the values of k and epsilon make sense?

I know these are a lot of questions, but any help is much appreciated.
Thank you in advance,

Maximus
Maximus91 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 24, 2012, 14:20
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Maarten
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 14
Maximus91 is on a distinguished road
Anyone any suggestions?
Maximus91 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is this understanding of turbulence models correct? 3kha Main CFD Forum 3 January 31, 2011 22:31
Eddy Viscosity Model Parameters Tristan CFX 5 January 20, 2010 16:25
Reynolds transport, turbulence model, etc Beginner Main CFD Forum 1 January 7, 2009 06:36
some questions about SA turbulence model? J. Jiang Main CFD Forum 1 June 11, 2006 21:02
ANSYS/FLOTRAN Mark Snyder Main CFD Forum 7 January 17, 2000 17:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:32.