|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I did an analisys in steady state, interface between steel and air (Air Gas Ideal), a temperature range of 77 F to 770 F in the analysis.
If the analisys has a bouyancy reference density of 1.05 kg/m^3 and other analysis has a bouyancy reference density of 1.1 kg/m^3. The boundary conditions are the same in both cases, Why did I find a huge difference in the results? |
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| REAL GAS UDF | brian | FLUENT | 6 | September 11, 2006 09:23 |
| CFX 10's solutions differ from CFX 5.7's | Atit Koonsrisuk | CFX | 4 | July 26, 2006 12:59 |
| density gradients in CFX post | prabhu | CFX | 1 | June 12, 2006 07:47 |
| Buoyancy production for species concentration | George Gerber | FLUENT | 1 | May 25, 2006 17:56 |
| CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 05:07 |