CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

How would you answer back those who are skeptical about CFD?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 6, 2012, 18:28
Default How would you answer back those who are skeptical about CFD?
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 7
1/153 is on a distinguished road
Dear all,

This is not a technical question.
Just curious to know how would you guys answer back to those who are skeptical to CFD? I am sure you would surely meet a lot of them.
I met a guy asked me something, in his idea turb model A works for case A, turb model B works for case B. But in your specific case and geometry, how could you be sure that the model works in your case?

I said the validation of the model had been done by myself in APG, ZPG and FPG flows and various other flows with similar situations, blahblah, to check the discretization, modeling sensitivity, grid convergence, blahblah. So the extension of using it in this geometry is even though not 100% guaranteed, but is the best one can do, and these models are not blindly used, and usually the results prove to be quite accurate. But he didn't buy it. I am confused, am I not saying to the point?

What would you answer with?
1/153 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2012, 18:44
vicarious's Avatar
Pedram Mojtabavi
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Iran
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 8
vicarious is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to vicarious
You're right buddy. Skeptical people should not enter the CFD territory!
vicarious is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2012, 21:39
Senior Member
sail's Avatar
Vieri Abolaffio
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Always on the move.
Posts: 308
Rep Power: 10
sail is on a distinguished road
IMHO, you can't. if he decide to do not trust you, you can't force him.

CFD is not a magic bullet, it is just a tool and thus imperfect.

there is plenty of errors and assumptions in every simulation, and it must be used accordingly. actually I belive that being skeptical in fundamental to the cfd analyst.

it is a powerful tool, with his advantages and disadvantages, exactly like any other, including experimental fluid dynamics.
Naval architecture and CFD consultancy
sail is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASME CFD Symposium - Call for Papers Chris Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 September 25, 2001 10:17
ASME CFD Symposium Chris Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 22, 2001 06:41
Can we quantify the fruits of CFD? Brady Brown Main CFD Forum 14 December 15, 1999 10:42
public CFD Code development Heinz Wilkening Main CFD Forum 38 March 5, 1999 12:44
CFD - Trends and Perspectives Jonas Larsson Main CFD Forum 16 August 7, 1998 16:27

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36.